[PATCH v4] tpm: Add Upgrade/Reduced mode support for TPM2 modules

Subsystems: the rest, tpm device driver

STALE1856d

3 messages, 2 authors, 2021-08-09 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH v4] tpm: Add Upgrade/Reduced mode support for TPM2 modules

From: Borys Movchan <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-06 14:16:00

If something went wrong during the TPM firmware upgrade, like power
failure or the firmware image file get corrupted, the TPM might end
up in Upgrade or Failure mode upon the next start. The state is
persistent between the TPM power cycle/restart.

According to TPM specification:
 * If the TPM is in Upgrade mode, it will answer with TPM2_RC_UPGRADE
   to all commands except Field Upgrade related ones.
 * If the TPM is in Failure mode, it will allow performing TPM
   initialization but will not provide any crypto operations.
   Will happily respond to Field Upgrade calls.

Change the behavior of the tpm2_auto_startup(), so it detects the active
running mode of the TPM.  It is easy to determine that TPM is in Upgrade
mode by relying on the fact that tpm2_do_selftest() will return
TPM2_RC_UPGRADE. In such a case, there is no point to finish the
start-up procedure as the TPM will not accept any commands, except
firmware upgrade related.

On the other hand, if the TPM is in Failure mode, it will successfully
respond to both tpm2_do_selftest() and tpm2_startup() calls. Although,
will fail to answer to tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl(). Use this fact to
conclude that TPM is in Failure mode.

If the chip is in the Upgrade or Failure mode, the function returns -EIO
error code.

The return value is checked in the tpm_chip_register() call to determine
the state of the TPM. If the TPM is not in normal operation mode, set
the `limited_mode` flag. If the flag is set then the TPM is not able to
provide any crypto functionality.  Correspondignly, the calls to
tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl(), tpm_add_hwrng() and tpm_get_pcr_allocation()
will fail. Use the flag to exclude them from the initialization
sequence.

Signed-off-by: Borys Movchan <redacted>
---

Notes:
    v2:
    * Commit message updated.
    
    v3:
    * Commit message reworked.
    
    v4:
    * Description of how tpm2_auto_startup() detects the mode added to
      commit message.

 drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 include/linux/tpm.h         |  1 +
 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
index ddaeceb7e109..ff2367c447fb 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
@@ -574,20 +574,25 @@ static int tpm_get_pcr_allocation(struct tpm_chip *chip)
 int tpm_chip_register(struct tpm_chip *chip)
 {
 	int rc;
+	bool limited_mode = false;
 
 	rc = tpm_chip_start(chip);
 	if (rc)
 		return rc;
 	rc = tpm_auto_startup(chip);
-	if (rc) {
+	if (rc == -EIO) {
+		limited_mode = true;
+	} else if (rc) {
 		tpm_chip_stop(chip);
 		return rc;
 	}
 
-	rc = tpm_get_pcr_allocation(chip);
-	tpm_chip_stop(chip);
-	if (rc)
-		return rc;
+	if (!limited_mode) {
+		rc = tpm_get_pcr_allocation(chip);
+		tpm_chip_stop(chip);
+		if (rc)
+			return rc;
+	}
 
 	tpm_sysfs_add_device(chip);
 
@@ -595,9 +600,11 @@ int tpm_chip_register(struct tpm_chip *chip)
 
 	tpm_add_ppi(chip);
 
-	rc = tpm_add_hwrng(chip);
-	if (rc)
-		goto out_ppi;
+	if (!limited_mode) {
+		rc = tpm_add_hwrng(chip);
+		if (rc)
+			goto out_ppi;
+	}
 
 	rc = tpm_add_char_device(chip);
 	if (rc)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
index a25815a6f625..7468353ed67d 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
@@ -718,7 +718,8 @@ static int tpm2_startup(struct tpm_chip *chip)
  *                     sequence
  * @chip: TPM chip to use
  *
- * Returns 0 on success, < 0 in case of fatal error.
+ * Returns 0 on success, -ENODEV in case of fatal error,
+ *	    -EIO in case of Reduced/Upgrade mode
  */
 int tpm2_auto_startup(struct tpm_chip *chip)
 {
@@ -729,7 +730,10 @@ int tpm2_auto_startup(struct tpm_chip *chip)
 		goto out;
 
 	rc = tpm2_do_selftest(chip);
-	if (rc && rc != TPM2_RC_INITIALIZE)
+	if (rc == TPM2_RC_UPGRADE) {
+		rc = -EIO;
+		goto out;
+	} else if (rc && rc != TPM2_RC_INITIALIZE)
 		goto out;
 
 	if (rc == TPM2_RC_INITIALIZE) {
@@ -743,6 +747,10 @@ int tpm2_auto_startup(struct tpm_chip *chip)
 	}
 
 	rc = tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl(chip);
+	if (rc) { /* Succeeded until here, but failed -> reduced mode */
+		rc = -EIO;
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 out:
 	if (rc > 0)
diff --git a/include/linux/tpm.h b/include/linux/tpm.h
index aa11fe323c56..e873c42907f0 100644
--- a/include/linux/tpm.h
+++ b/include/linux/tpm.h
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ enum tpm2_return_codes {
 	TPM2_RC_INITIALIZE	= 0x0100, /* RC_VER1 */
 	TPM2_RC_FAILURE		= 0x0101,
 	TPM2_RC_DISABLED	= 0x0120,
+	TPM2_RC_UPGRADE		= 0x012D,
 	TPM2_RC_COMMAND_CODE    = 0x0143,
 	TPM2_RC_TESTING		= 0x090A, /* RC_WARN */
 	TPM2_RC_REFERENCE_H0	= 0x0910,
-- 
2.20.1

Re: [PATCH v4] tpm: Add Upgrade/Reduced mode support for TPM2 modules

From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-08-09 04:55:36

On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 04:18:08PM +0200, Borys Movchan wrote:
If something went wrong during the TPM firmware upgrade, like power
failure or the firmware image file get corrupted, the TPM might end
up in Upgrade or Failure mode upon the next start. The state is
persistent between the TPM power cycle/restart.

According to TPM specification:
 * If the TPM is in Upgrade mode, it will answer with TPM2_RC_UPGRADE
   to all commands except Field Upgrade related ones.
 * If the TPM is in Failure mode, it will allow performing TPM
   initialization but will not provide any crypto operations.
   Will happily respond to Field Upgrade calls.

Change the behavior of the tpm2_auto_startup(), so it detects the active
running mode of the TPM.  It is easy to determine that TPM is in Upgrade
mode by relying on the fact that tpm2_do_selftest() will return
TPM2_RC_UPGRADE. In such a case, there is no point to finish the
start-up procedure as the TPM will not accept any commands, except
firmware upgrade related.

On the other hand, if the TPM is in Failure mode, it will successfully
respond to both tpm2_do_selftest() and tpm2_startup() calls. Although,
will fail to answer to tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl(). Use this fact to
conclude that TPM is in Failure mode.

If the chip is in the Upgrade or Failure mode, the function returns -EIO
error code.

The return value is checked in the tpm_chip_register() call to determine
the state of the TPM. If the TPM is not in normal operation mode, set
the `limited_mode` flag. If the flag is set then the TPM is not able to
Nit: do not use hyphens for limited mode. 'limited_mode' is fine. I'm
also fine with just limited_mode.
provide any crypto functionality.  Correspondignly, the calls to
tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl(), tpm_add_hwrng() and tpm_get_pcr_allocation()
will fail. Use the flag to exclude them from the initialization
sequence.
This is blacklisting. E.g. I'm not sure why all of the sysfs attributes
would still be exported. Some of them use TPM commands. That was just
one random example I came up with.

It's easy to come up other examples, like, why you provide still tpmrm0,
which is dependent on a TPM running normal mode?

This misses completely the rationale for ever acking this change: which
parts of the uapi are export and *why*.

Please whitelist the things that should still work. Even the obvious
ones like /dev/tpm0 (because of TPM_RC_UPGRADE).

This is clearly a faulty and incomplete patch in its current form.

/Jarkko

Re: [PATCH v4] tpm: Add Upgrade/Reduced mode support for TPM2 modules

From: Borys Movchan <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-09 18:03:00

On 8/9/21 6:55 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 04:18:08PM +0200, Borys Movchan wrote:
quoted
If something went wrong during the TPM firmware upgrade, like power
failure or the firmware image file get corrupted, the TPM might end
up in Upgrade or Failure mode upon the next start. The state is
persistent between the TPM power cycle/restart.

According to TPM specification:
 * If the TPM is in Upgrade mode, it will answer with TPM2_RC_UPGRADE
   to all commands except Field Upgrade related ones.
 * If the TPM is in Failure mode, it will allow performing TPM
   initialization but will not provide any crypto operations.
   Will happily respond to Field Upgrade calls.

Change the behavior of the tpm2_auto_startup(), so it detects the active
running mode of the TPM.  It is easy to determine that TPM is in Upgrade
mode by relying on the fact that tpm2_do_selftest() will return
TPM2_RC_UPGRADE. In such a case, there is no point to finish the
start-up procedure as the TPM will not accept any commands, except
firmware upgrade related.

On the other hand, if the TPM is in Failure mode, it will successfully
respond to both tpm2_do_selftest() and tpm2_startup() calls. Although,
will fail to answer to tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl(). Use this fact to
conclude that TPM is in Failure mode.

If the chip is in the Upgrade or Failure mode, the function returns -EIO
error code.

The return value is checked in the tpm_chip_register() call to determine
the state of the TPM. If the TPM is not in normal operation mode, set
the `limited_mode` flag. If the flag is set then the TPM is not able to
Nit: do not use hyphens for limited mode. 'limited_mode' is fine. I'm
also fine with just limited_mode.

Done

quoted
provide any crypto functionality.  Correspondignly, the calls to
tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl(), tpm_add_hwrng() and tpm_get_pcr_allocation()
will fail. Use the flag to exclude them from the initialization
sequence.
This is blacklisting. E.g. I'm not sure why all of the sysfs attributes
would still be exported. Some of them use TPM commands. That was just
one random example I came up with.

It's easy to come up other examples, like, why you provide still tpmrm0,
which is dependent on a TPM running normal mode?

This misses completely the rationale for ever acking this change: which
parts of the uapi are export and *why*.

Please whitelist the things that should still work. Even the obvious
ones like /dev/tpm0 (because of TPM_RC_UPGRADE).

This is clearly a faulty and incomplete patch in its current form.

I expected something like this. In new patch version I tried to disable all
functionality which should not work in Upgrade/Failure mode.

Basically, I am interested in getting /dev/tpm0 working when TPM is in limited mode.
In this state, the TPM is not capable to provide any other functionality except firmware
upgrade/recovery. So the rest of features should be disabled/removed.
Physical reset of the TPM is mandatory part of the firmware upgrade/recovery. Which will
lead to driver rebind/reload and reappearance of all interfaces applicable to normal operational
mode.

/Jarkko
Kind regards,
Borys
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help