Re: [PATCH] Input: iforce - Fix exception handling in iforce_usb_probe()
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: 2023-03-20 04:35:36
Also in:
kernel-janitors, lkml
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: 2023-03-20 04:35:36
Also in:
kernel-janitors, lkml
On 2023/03/20 13:21, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 07:03:00PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:quoted
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2023 18:50:51 +0100 The label “fail” was used to jump to another pointer check despite of the detail in the implementation of the function “iforce_usb_probe” that it was determined already that a corresponding variable contained still a null pointer. 1. Use more appropriate labels instead. 2. Reorder jump targets at the end. 3. Delete a redundant check. This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.I am sorry, but I do not understand what the actual issue is. The fact that come Coccinelle script complains is not enough to change the code.
Right. There is no issue with the code, for usb_free_urb(NULL) is a no-op. Proposing as a cleanup, without Fixes: tags, could be possible though.