From: Leo L. Schwab <hidden> Date: 2021-07-27 04:39:14
The spaceball.c module was not properly parsing the movement reports
coming from the device. The code read axis data as signed 16-bit
little-endian values starting at offset 2.
In fact, axis data in Spaceball movement reports are signed 16-bit
big-endian values starting at offset 3. This was determined first by
visually inspecting the data packets, and later verified by consulting:
http://spacemice.org/pdf/SpaceBall_2003-3003_Protocol.pdf
If this ever worked properly, it was in the time before Git...
Signed-off-by: Leo L. Schwab <redacted>
---
drivers/input/joystick/spaceball.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
From: Leo L. Schwab <hidden> Date: 2021-12-16 09:29:21
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 09:06:24PM -0700, Leo L. Schwab wrote:
The spaceball.c module was not properly parsing the movement reports
coming from the device. [ ... ]
Um... Ping? This issue still exists, and it's been around a really
long time. I've been using this patch to successfully fly around QuakeWorld
for several months now.
Schwab
Hi Leo,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 09:06:24PM -0700, Leo L. Schwab wrote:
The spaceball.c module was not properly parsing the movement reports
coming from the device. The code read axis data as signed 16-bit
little-endian values starting at offset 2.
In fact, axis data in Spaceball movement reports are signed 16-bit
big-endian values starting at offset 3. This was determined first by
visually inspecting the data packets, and later verified by consulting:
http://spacemice.org/pdf/SpaceBall_2003-3003_Protocol.pdf
If this ever worked properly, it was in the time before Git...
Thank you for the patch.
quoted hunk
Signed-off-by: Leo L. Schwab <redacted>
---
drivers/input/joystick/spaceball.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Could we write
for (i == 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(spaceball_axes); i++)
input_report_abs(dev, spaceball_axes[i],
(__s16)(get_unaligned_be16(&data[i * 2]);
instead?
Thanks!
--
Dmitry
From: Leo L. Schwab <hidden> Date: 2021-12-21 10:32:15
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 12:59:21AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Could we write
for (i == 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(spaceball_axes); i++)
input_report_abs(dev, spaceball_axes[i],
(__s16)(get_unaligned_be16(&data[i * 2]);
instead?