From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> Date: 2021-06-07 21:47:38
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a
warning by explicitly adding a fallthrough; statement.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
JFYI: We had thousands of these sorts of warnings and now we are down
to just 13 in linux-next(20210607). This is one of those last
remaining warnings. :)
drivers/input/joystick/sidewinder.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
fallthrough;
case 45: /* Ambiguous packet length */
if (j <= 40) { /* ID length less or eq 40 -> FSP */
+ fallthrough;
case 43:
sw->type = SW_ID_FSP;
break;
Yuck. Super ugly. There's no need to play games with indentation.
Perhaps the simpler:
case 43:
sw->type = SW_ID_FSP;
break;
case 45: /* Ambiguous packet length */
if (j <= 40) { /* ID length less or eq 40 -> FSP */
sw->type = SW_ID_FSP;
break;
}
sw->number++;
fallthrough;
fallthrough;
case 45: /* Ambiguous packet length */
if (j <= 40) { /* ID length less or eq 40 -> FSP */
+ fallthrough;
case 43:
sw->type = SW_ID_FSP;
break;
Yuck. Super ugly. There's no need to play games with indentation.
Yeah, the original code is not pretty :(
Isn't this a Duff device for performance[1]?
In which case it might be better not to modify it and just go
with the fallthrough marking?
Another similar case can be found at
drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_sds.c:714:
714 static void *asd_find_ll_by_id(void * const start, const u8 id0, const u8 id1)
715 {
716 struct asd_ll_el *el = start;
717
718 do {
719 switch (id1) {
720 default:
721 if (el->id1 == id1)
722 case 0xFF:
723 if (el->id0 == id0)
724 return el;
725 }
726 el = start + le16_to_cpu(el->next);
727 } while (el != start);
728
729 return NULL;
730 }
--
Gustavo
[1] https://www.drdobbs.com/a-reusable-duff-device/184406208
quoted
Perhaps the simpler:
case 43:
sw->type = SW_ID_FSP;
break;
case 45: /* Ambiguous packet length */
if (j <= 40) { /* ID length less or eq 40 -> FSP */
sw->type = SW_ID_FSP;
break;
}
sw->number++;
fallthrough;
Could you resubmit this version properly formatted?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry