On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 09:27 +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:

quoted

On Feb 20 2017 or thereabouts, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

quoted

There are three possibilities in gpiod_count(): ACPI, OF, and
platform data.

Some of them return 0, which requires to be handled separately,
though
developers rather lazy and just shadow an actual error code.

Let's make this API consistent by not allowing 0 in returned value.

There are luckily only 3 users right now, one of them handles this
properly, the rest is converted in this series.

Series is supposed to go through GPIO tree.

Andy Shevchenko (4):
  gpio: acpi: Don't return 0 on acpi_gpio_count()
  gpio: of: Don't return 0 on dt_gpio_count()
  platform/x86: surface3_button: Propagate error from gpiod_count()
  Input: soc_button_array - Propagate error from gpiod_count()

Not sure if this still matters, but still:
Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <redacted>

I'm sure it is.

Linus, is your plan to go through queue after merge window is closed?

Yes sorry for the delay, it was a busy merge window etc.

I'd like to have some nod from Mika/Rafael that this is what
we want to do. If I don't hear anything I guess I will just
merge them, it looks right to me.

Yours,
Linus Walleij