On 30.08.2016 11:03, Lee Jones wrote:

On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Marcin Niestroj wrote:

quoted

ping

Don't do that!

If you think the patch hasn't attracted attention in >2 weeks, then
it's probably slipped through the gaps and you need to send a
[RESEND].

Clear.

However ...

quoted

On 20.06.2016 12:50, Marcin Niestroj wrote:

quoted

Add tps65217 power buttor subdevice with assigned IRQ resources.

Signed-off-by: Marcin Niestroj <redacted>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <redacted>

This patch has a maintainer Ack, so why are you pinging?

Because I didn't see it applied anywhere and there were no new
comments, so I thought it slipped somewhere.

So my question is: what happens with the patch after maintainer Ack?
Are we still waiting for some comments from the community? Do I still
need to worry, that the patch might slipped? What is author's role now?

quoted

quoted

---
Depends on patch 1 in series

Changes v1 -> v4: none

 drivers/mfd/tps65217.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65217.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65217.c
index 41b5d59..57c8741 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/tps65217.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65217.c

@@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ static struct resource charger_resources[] = {
 	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(TPS65217_IRQ_USB, "USB"),
 };

+static struct resource pb_resources[] = {
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(TPS65217_IRQ_PB, "PB"),
+};
+
 struct tps65217_irq {
 	int mask;
 	int interrupt;

@@ -122,6 +126,12 @@ static struct mfd_cell tps65217s[] = {
 		.resources = charger_resources,
 		.of_compatible = "ti,tps65217-charger",
 	},
+	{
+		.name = "tps65217-pwrbutton",
+		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(pb_resources),
+		.resources = pb_resources,
+		.of_compatible = "ti,tps65217-pwrbutton",
+	},
 };

 static irqreturn_t tps65217_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)

-- 
Marcin Niestroj
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html