# Re: \[PATCH v5 05/46\] pwm: introduce the pwm\_args concept

- From: Stephen Boyd \<hidden\>
- Date: 2016-03-30 21:55:19 
- List: linux-input
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-input/2016/03/4718773
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-pwm/2016/03/4718740/t.md

```text
On 03/30, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> @@ -74,6 +74,23 @@ enum pwm_polarity {
>  	PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED,
>  };
>  
> +/**
> + * struct pwm_args - PWM arguments
> + * @period: reference period
> + * @polarity: reference polarity
> + *
> + * This structure describe board-dependent arguments attached to a PWM

s/describe/describes/

> + * device. Those arguments are usually retrieved from the PWM lookup table or
> + * DT definition.
> + * This should not be confused with the PWM state: PWM args not representing

s/not representing/don't represent/ ?

> + * the current PWM state, but the configuration the PWM user plan to use

s/plan/plans/

> + * on this PWM device.
> + */
> +struct pwm_args {
> +	unsigned int period;
> +	enum pwm_polarity polarity;
> +};
> +

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
```