From: Simon Farnsworth <hidden> Date: 2012-08-22 10:17:32
This QUANTA device is driven by the generic hid-multitouch.ko driver, and
therefore shouldn't be in the special drivers list.
I've gone over the entire special drivers list in hid-core.c; this is the
only device I spotted that's listed as needing a special driver, but doesn't
have an entry in a struct hid_driver's id_table.
Signed-off-by: Simon Farnsworth <redacted>
---
Applying just this patch is enough to fix the problem I described in my mail
"QUANTA touchscreen controller integrated in HP2310ti no longer recognised
(regression in 3.5 and later as compared to 3.3)".
This looks like an oversight in commit 4fa3a58; that commit removes most
multitouch screens from this list, but missed this one. Henrik should be
able to confirm, though, so I'd appreciate his sign-off.
drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
This QUANTA device is driven by the generic hid-multitouch.ko driver, and
therefore shouldn't be in the special drivers list.
I've gone over the entire special drivers list in hid-core.c; this is the
only device I spotted that's listed as needing a special driver, but doesn't
have an entry in a struct hid_driver's id_table.
Signed-off-by: Simon Farnsworth <redacted>
---
Applying just this patch is enough to fix the problem I described in my mail
"QUANTA touchscreen controller integrated in HP2310ti no longer recognised
(regression in 3.5 and later as compared to 3.3)".
This looks like an oversight in commit 4fa3a58; that commit removes most
multitouch screens from this list, but missed this one. Henrik should be
able to confirm, though, so I'd appreciate his sign-off.
drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
From: Henrik Rydberg <hidden> Date: 2012-08-22 16:56:05
quoted
Applying just this patch is enough to fix the problem I described in my mail
"QUANTA touchscreen controller integrated in HP2310ti no longer recognised
(regression in 3.5 and later as compared to 3.3)".
This looks like an oversight in commit 4fa3a58; that commit removes most
multitouch screens from this list, but missed this one. Henrik should be
able to confirm, though, so I'd appreciate his sign-off.
Yes, good find. We have two identifiers for the same device,
USB_DEVICE_ID_PIXART_IMAGING_INC_OPTICAL_TOUCH_SCREEN and
USB_DEVICE_ID_QUANTA_OPTICAL_TOUCH_3001, which might explain why it
was overlooked. I think we should get rid of one of them. Also, I
wonder if the HID_QUIRK_NOGET quirk is still necessary.
Thanks,
Henrik
From: Simon Farnsworth <hidden> Date: 2012-08-23 10:11:12
On Wednesday 22 August 2012 19:00:52 Henrik Rydberg wrote:
quoted
quoted
Applying just this patch is enough to fix the problem I described in my mail
"QUANTA touchscreen controller integrated in HP2310ti no longer recognised
(regression in 3.5 and later as compared to 3.3)".
This looks like an oversight in commit 4fa3a58; that commit removes most
multitouch screens from this list, but missed this one. Henrik should be
able to confirm, though, so I'd appreciate his sign-off.
Yes, good find. We have two identifiers for the same device,
USB_DEVICE_ID_PIXART_IMAGING_INC_OPTICAL_TOUCH_SCREEN and
USB_DEVICE_ID_QUANTA_OPTICAL_TOUCH_3001, which might explain why it
was overlooked. I think we should get rid of one of them. Also, I
wonder if the HID_QUIRK_NOGET quirk is still necessary.
I'll send a follow-on patch to remove the PIXART_IMAGING identifier. I tried
removing the HID_QURIK_NOGET quirk, but it appears to be needed: without it,
I get:
[ 1.472269] usb 6-1: New USB device found, idVendor=0408, idProduct=3001
[ 1.472275] usb 6-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0
[ 1.472279] usb 6-1: Product: Optical Touch Screen
[ 1.472284] usb 6-1: Manufacturer: QUANTA
<snip>
[ 15.884252] hid-multitouch 0003:0408:3001.0001: usb_submit_urb(ctrl) failed: -1
[ 15.884337] hid-multitouch 0003:0408:3001.0001: timeout initializing reports
[ 15.884584] input: QUANTA Optical Touch Screen as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb6/6-1/6-1:1.0/input/input10
[ 15.884783] hid-multitouch 0003:0408:3001.0001: input,hidraw0: USB HID v1.10 Device [QUANTA Optical Touch Screen] on usb-0000:00:1d.1-1/input0
If I leave the quirk in place, I don't get the 14 second delay, suggesting
that the quirk is needed on this hardware.
--
Simon Farnsworth
Software Engineer
ONELAN Ltd
http://www.onelan.com
From: Henrik Rydberg <hidden> Date: 2012-08-23 16:44:04
I'll send a follow-on patch to remove the PIXART_IMAGING identifier. I tried
removing the HID_QURIK_NOGET quirk, but it appears to be needed: without it,
I get:
[ 1.472269] usb 6-1: New USB device found, idVendor=0408, idProduct=3001
[ 1.472275] usb 6-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0
[ 1.472279] usb 6-1: Product: Optical Touch Screen
[ 1.472284] usb 6-1: Manufacturer: QUANTA
<snip>
[ 15.884252] hid-multitouch 0003:0408:3001.0001: usb_submit_urb(ctrl) failed: -1
[ 15.884337] hid-multitouch 0003:0408:3001.0001: timeout initializing reports
[ 15.884584] input: QUANTA Optical Touch Screen as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb6/6-1/6-1:1.0/input/input10
[ 15.884783] hid-multitouch 0003:0408:3001.0001: input,hidraw0: USB HID v1.10 Device [QUANTA Optical Touch Screen] on usb-0000:00:1d.1-1/input0
If I leave the quirk in place, I don't get the 14 second delay, suggesting
that the quirk is needed on this hardware.
It makes sense, the same applies to 0x3008. Thanks for checking.
Henrik