On So, 2009-12-06 at 12:09 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 08:53:57PM +0100, Sebastian Kapfer wrote:

quoted

quoted

[...] 
Hmm I guess we could do something like this, but IMHO it makes the code
needlessly arcane.  What would be the point?  Save 3 bytes of buffer?
Deliver the mouse movement a microsecond earlier?

No, this allows us validate the data bytes as tehy come in and probably
detect desync right away and resync earlier.

Hi Dmitry,

note that the resync code is disabled anyway, and the hardware gets
reset in that case, which means losing tens of milliseconds.  (I don't
think we have desync problems left, at least for this particular hw.)

-- 
Best Regards,  | Hi! I'm a .signature virus. Copy me into
 Sebastian     | your ~/.signature to help me spread!