I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <redacted>
---
drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
index 97a14fe..ef8f3dd 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
#include "libata.h"
unsigned int ata_acpi_gtf_filter = ATA_ACPI_FILTER_DEFAULT;
-module_param_named(acpi_gtf_filter, ata_acpi_gtf_filter, int, 0644);
+module_param_named(acpi_gtf_filter, ata_acpi_gtf_filter, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(acpi_gtf_filter, "filter mask for ACPI _GTF commands, set to filter out (0x1=set xfermode, 0x2=lock/freeze lock, 0x4=DIPM, 0x8=FPDMA non-zero offset, 0x10=FPDMA DMA Setup FIS auto-activate)");
#define NO_PORT_MULT 0xffff
--
2.9.2