I wish I am posting the message to the right place. I am just curious
what's the most important reason to choose UDP instead of TCP. And when
some error happens, will NFS do retransmission ? thanks.
Ronghua
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 03:12:11PM -0500, Ronghua Zhang wrote:
I wish I am posting the message to the right place. I am just curious
what's the most important reason to choose UDP instead of TCP. And when
some error happens, will NFS do retransmission ? thanks.
You need to familiarize yourself with the history of NFS.
Who, when, and in what kind of environment did invent NFS.
(Sun, late 1980es, machines with _very_ low power compared
to todays standards, and very slow networks!)
Doing NFS over TCP has been a lot more recent development.
Yes, when errors (like UDP datagram loss -> response timeout)
occur, NFS must do retrying / other error processing.
Ronghua
/Matti Aarnio
Em Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 03:12:11PM -0500, Ronghua Zhang escreveu:
I wish I am posting the message to the right place. I am just curious
what's the most important reason to choose UDP instead of TCP. And when
some error happens, will NFS do retransmission ? thanks.
NFS also supports TCP, just config it to use TCP.
- Arnaldo
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 05:18:08PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 03:12:11PM -0500, Ronghua Zhang escreveu:
quoted
I wish I am posting the message to the right place. I am just curious
what's the most important reason to choose UDP instead of TCP. And when
some error happens, will NFS do retransmission ? thanks.
NFS also supports TCP, just config it to use TCP.
IIRC only NFS client does. Or is both client and server RPC over TCP
already working?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan 'Bulb' Hudec [off-list ref]