# Re: \[PATCH 1/6\] video/logo: remove orphan .pgm Makefile rule

- From: Helge Deller \<deller@gmx.de\>
- Date: 2026-01-02 19:59:30 
- List: linux-fbdev
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-fbdev/2026/01/3351013
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-fbdev/2025/12/3349261/t.md

```text
On 1/2/26 18:25, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
> On 02/01/2026 at 18:18, David Heidelberg wrote:
>> On 02/01/2026 18:13, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
>>> On 02/01/2026 at 17:34, David Heidelberg wrote:
>>>> On 30/12/2025 23:20, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
>>>>> The kernel has no actual grey-scale logos. And looking at the git
>>>>> history, it seems that there never was one (or maybe there was in the
>>>>> pre-git history? I did not check that far…)
>>>>>
>>>>> Remove the Makefile rule for the .pgm grey scale images.
>>>>
>>>> Great to see this series.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>> I think the Fixes: tag should still go here, even if it is not very
>>>> specific.
>>>
>>> But then, what do I put in the fixes tag? This:
>>>
>>>     Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
>>>
>>> ?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>>>
>>> I am not sure it is worth bothering the stable team for something that
>>> isn't causing any real harm.
>>
>> That was my original thinking as well, but the Fixes tag is not only
>> about stable backports. It is also used for tracking, tooling, and
>> documentation, so stable picking up such patches is just one of its
>> purposes.
>
> OK. Then why not. I added the tag in my local tree, but I will wait a
> couple days for the other review comments before sending. I will not
> spam everyone with a v3 just for that.

I like your patch!
So, I've added the v2 series to the fbdev git tree.

I don't think a "Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")" tag is
appropriate, since it doesn't fixes anything.

Let's see if issues arise due to the wider testing...

Helge
```