# \[PATCH -next\] fbdev: atyfb: use LCD management functions for PPC\_PMAC also

- List: linux-fbdev
- 3 messages, 2 authors
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-fbdev/2021/02/6279562/t

## \[PATCH -next\] fbdev: atyfb: use LCD management functions for PPC\_PMAC also

- From: Randy Dunlap \<rdunlap@infradead.org\>
- Date: 2021-02-26 00:06:47 
- Message: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-fbdev/2021/02/6279562.md

```text
Include PPC_PMAC in the configs that use aty_ld_lcd() and
aty_st_lcd() implementations so that the PM code may work
correctly for PPC_PMAC.

Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <redacted>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: <redacted>
Cc: <redacted>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <redacted>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <redacted>
Cc: David Airlie <redacted>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
---
Daniel- We also need this patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20210224215528.822-1-rdunlap@infradead.org/
to fix a kernel test robot build error.

 drivers/video/fbdev/aty/atyfb_base.c |    8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- linux-next-20210219.orig/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/atyfb_base.c
+++ linux-next-20210219/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/atyfb_base.c
@@ -132,8 +132,7 @@
 #define PRINTKI(fmt, args...)	printk(KERN_INFO "atyfb: " fmt, ## args)
 #define PRINTKE(fmt, args...)	printk(KERN_ERR "atyfb: " fmt, ## args)
 
-#if defined(CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT) || defined(CONFIG_FB_ATY_GENERIC_LCD) || \
-defined(CONFIG_FB_ATY_BACKLIGHT)
+#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_PMAC)
 static const u32 lt_lcd_regs[] = {
 	CNFG_PANEL_LG,
 	LCD_GEN_CNTL_LG,
@@ -175,8 +174,7 @@ u32 aty_ld_lcd(int index, const struct a
 		return aty_ld_le32(LCD_DATA, par);
 	}
 }
-#else /* defined(CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT) || defined(CONFIG_FB_ATY_BACKLIGHT) \
-	 defined(CONFIG_FB_ATY_GENERIC_LCD) */
+#else /* defined(CONFIG_PPC_PMAC) */
 void aty_st_lcd(int index, u32 val, const struct atyfb_par *par)
 { }
 
@@ -184,7 +182,7 @@ u32 aty_ld_lcd(int index, const struct a
 {
 	return 0;
 }
-#endif /* defined(CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT) || defined (CONFIG_FB_ATY_GENERIC_LCD) */
+#endif /* defined(CONFIG_PPC_PMAC) */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FB_ATY_GENERIC_LCD
 /*
```

## Re: \[PATCH -next\] fbdev: atyfb: use LCD management functions for PPC\_PMAC also

- From: Ville Syrjälä \<hidden\>
- Date: 2021-02-26 12:14:37 
- Message: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-fbdev/2021/02/6280013.md

```text
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 04:05:37PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Include PPC_PMAC in the configs that use aty_ld_lcd() and
> aty_st_lcd() implementations so that the PM code may work
> correctly for PPC_PMAC.
> 
> Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <redacted>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <redacted>
> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> Cc: <redacted>
> Cc: <redacted>
> Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <redacted>
> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <redacted>
> Cc: David Airlie <redacted>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> Daniel- We also need this patch:
> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20210224215528.822-1-rdunlap@infradead.org/
> to fix a kernel test robot build error.
> 
>  drivers/video/fbdev/aty/atyfb_base.c |    8 +++-----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> --- linux-next-20210219.orig/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/atyfb_base.c
> +++ linux-next-20210219/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/atyfb_base.c
> @@ -132,8 +132,7 @@
>  #define PRINTKI(fmt, args...)	printk(KERN_INFO "atyfb: " fmt, ## args)
>  #define PRINTKE(fmt, args...)	printk(KERN_ERR "atyfb: " fmt, ## args)
>  
> -#if defined(CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT) || defined(CONFIG_FB_ATY_GENERIC_LCD) || \
> -defined(CONFIG_FB_ATY_BACKLIGHT)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_PMAC)

Did you send an old version by accident? That's definitely
not what we want since it would break everything except PPC_PMAC.

>  static const u32 lt_lcd_regs[] = {
>  	CNFG_PANEL_LG,
>  	LCD_GEN_CNTL_LG,
> @@ -175,8 +174,7 @@ u32 aty_ld_lcd(int index, const struct a
>  		return aty_ld_le32(LCD_DATA, par);
>  	}
>  }
> -#else /* defined(CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT) || defined(CONFIG_FB_ATY_BACKLIGHT) \
> -	 defined(CONFIG_FB_ATY_GENERIC_LCD) */
> +#else /* defined(CONFIG_PPC_PMAC) */
>  void aty_st_lcd(int index, u32 val, const struct atyfb_par *par)
>  { }
>  
> @@ -184,7 +182,7 @@ u32 aty_ld_lcd(int index, const struct a
>  {
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -#endif /* defined(CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT) || defined (CONFIG_FB_ATY_GENERIC_LCD) */
> +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_PPC_PMAC) */
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_FB_ATY_GENERIC_LCD
>  /*

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
```

## Re: \[PATCH -next\] fbdev: atyfb: use LCD management functions for PPC\_PMAC also

- From: Randy Dunlap \<rdunlap@infradead.org\>
- Date: 2021-02-26 16:39:30 
- Message: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-fbdev/2021/02/6280220.md

```text
On 2/26/21 4:12 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 04:05:37PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> Include PPC_PMAC in the configs that use aty_ld_lcd() and
>> aty_st_lcd() implementations so that the PM code may work
>> correctly for PPC_PMAC.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <redacted>
>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <redacted>
>> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
>> Cc: <redacted>
>> Cc: <redacted>
>> Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <redacted>
>> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <redacted>
>> Cc: David Airlie <redacted>
>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> Daniel- We also need this patch:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20210224215528.822-1-rdunlap@infradead.org/
>> to fix a kernel test robot build error.
>>
>>  drivers/video/fbdev/aty/atyfb_base.c |    8 +++-----
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> --- linux-next-20210219.orig/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/atyfb_base.c
>> +++ linux-next-20210219/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/atyfb_base.c
>> @@ -132,8 +132,7 @@
>>  #define PRINTKI(fmt, args...)	printk(KERN_INFO "atyfb: " fmt, ## args)
>>  #define PRINTKE(fmt, args...)	printk(KERN_ERR "atyfb: " fmt, ## args)
>>  
>> -#if defined(CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT) || defined(CONFIG_FB_ATY_GENERIC_LCD) || \
>> -defined(CONFIG_FB_ATY_BACKLIGHT)
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_PMAC)
> 
> Did you send an old version by accident? That's definitely
> not what we want since it would break everything except PPC_PMAC.


Yikes!

Yes, thanks for catching that.
I'll get the newer version out soon.

>>  static const u32 lt_lcd_regs[] = {
>>  	CNFG_PANEL_LG,
>>  	LCD_GEN_CNTL_LG,
>> @@ -175,8 +174,7 @@ u32 aty_ld_lcd(int index, const struct a
>>  		return aty_ld_le32(LCD_DATA, par);
>>  	}
>>  }
>> -#else /* defined(CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT) || defined(CONFIG_FB_ATY_BACKLIGHT) \
>> -	 defined(CONFIG_FB_ATY_GENERIC_LCD) */
>> +#else /* defined(CONFIG_PPC_PMAC) */
>>  void aty_st_lcd(int index, u32 val, const struct atyfb_par *par)
>>  { }
>>  
>> @@ -184,7 +182,7 @@ u32 aty_ld_lcd(int index, const struct a
>>  {
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> -#endif /* defined(CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT) || defined (CONFIG_FB_ATY_GENERIC_LCD) */
>> +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_PPC_PMAC) */
>>  
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_FB_ATY_GENERIC_LCD
>>  /*
> 


-- 
~Randy

```
