# \[PATCH\] video: imx: Update the manufacturer name - Subsystems: FRAMEBUFFER LAYER, THE REST - Maintainers: Helge Deller, Linus Torvalds - List: linux-fbdev - 4 messages, 2 authors - Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-fbdev/2011/01/13461000/t ## \[PATCH\] video: imx: Update the manufacturer name - From: Fabio Estevam \ - Date: 2011-01-09 16:33:38 - Message: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-fbdev/2011/01/13461000.md ```text Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam --- drivers/video/Kconfig | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/video/Kconfig b/drivers/video/Kconfig index 55dc6fb..0ac30ef 100644 --- a/drivers/video/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/video/Kconfig @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ config FB_SA1100 Y here. config FB_IMX - tristate "Motorola i.MX LCD support" + tristate "Freescale i.MX LCD support" depends on FB && (HAVE_FB_IMX || ARCH_MX1 || ARCH_MX2) select FB_CFB_FILLRECT select FB_CFB_COPYAREA -- 1.6.0.4 ``` ## Re: \[PATCH\] video: imx: Update the manufacturer name - From: \ - Date: 2011-01-09 19:11:14 - Message: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-fbdev/2011/01/13461001.md ```text Hello Fabio, On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 02:33:38PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > --- > drivers/video/Kconfig | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/video/Kconfig b/drivers/video/Kconfig > index 55dc6fb..0ac30ef 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/video/Kconfig > @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ config FB_SA1100 > Y here. > > config FB_IMX > - tristate "Motorola i.MX LCD support" > + tristate "Freescale i.MX LCD support" do you have an explanation why this is wrong? Was it a copy&paste error? If it used to be correct I'd prefer to keep Motorola in there. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | ``` ## Re: \[PATCH\] video: imx: Update the manufacturer name - From: Fabio Estevam \ - Date: 2011-01-09 23:19:18 - Message: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-fbdev/2011/01/13461002.md ```text Hi Uwe, 2011/1/9 Uwe Kleine-König [ref]: > Hello Fabio, > > On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 02:33:38PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam >> --- >>  drivers/video/Kconfig |    2 +- >>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/video/Kconfig b/drivers/video/Kconfig >> index 55dc6fb..0ac30ef 100644 >> --- a/drivers/video/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/video/Kconfig >> @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ config FB_SA1100 >>         Y here. >> >>  config FB_IMX >> -     tristate "Motorola i.MX LCD support" >> +     tristate "Freescale i.MX LCD support" > do you have an explanation why this is wrong?  Was it a copy&paste > error?  If it used to be correct I'd prefer to keep Motorola in there. The reason is that there exists no "Motorola i.MX" anymore. Freescale is the company that manufactures the i.MX processors currently, not Motorola. Motorola used to manufacture i.MX devices until 2004. After the spin-off in 2004, Freescale continued as the i.MX manufacturer. Also, if you look at the first submission of the i.MX framebuffer driver from Sascha (imxfb: Add Freescale i.MX framebuffer driver - http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h|2f891cb64b0b9c8d389da97c221ee4288f1307) it contains the correct name there ,so this patch makes the driver selection consistent. Regards, Fabio Estevam ``` ## Re: \[PATCH\] video: imx: Update the manufacturer name - From: \ - Date: 2011-01-10 09:39:46 - Message: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-fbdev/2011/01/13461003.md ```text Hello Fabio, On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 09:19:18PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: > 2011/1/9 Uwe Kleine-König [ref]: > > On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 02:33:38PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > >> --- > >>  drivers/video/Kconfig |    2 +- > >>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/video/Kconfig b/drivers/video/Kconfig > >> index 55dc6fb..0ac30ef 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/video/Kconfig > >> +++ b/drivers/video/Kconfig > >> @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ config FB_SA1100 > >>         Y here. > >> > >>  config FB_IMX > >> -     tristate "Motorola i.MX LCD support" > >> +     tristate "Freescale i.MX LCD support" > > do you have an explanation why this is wrong?  Was it a copy&paste > > error?  If it used to be correct I'd prefer to keep Motorola in there. > > The reason is that there exists no "Motorola i.MX" anymore. > > Freescale is the company that manufactures the i.MX processors > currently, not Motorola. > > Motorola used to manufacture i.MX devices until 2004. After the > spin-off in 2004, Freescale continued as the i.MX manufacturer. > > Also, if you look at the first submission of the i.MX framebuffer > driver from Sascha (imxfb: Add Freescale i.MX framebuffer driver - > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h|2f891cb64b0b9c8d389da97c221ee4288f1307) > it contains the correct name there ,so this patch makes the driver > selection consistent. If you add (a maybe shortend version of) this to the commit log it would be fine for me. Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | ```