[PATCH] viafb: returns 0 two too early.

DORMANTno replies

From: Roel Kluin <hidden>
Date: 2009-02-25 13:21:17
Subsystem: framebuffer layer, the rest · Maintainers: Helge Deller, Linus Torvalds

Otherwise this will already return 0 if iteration MAXLOOP-2 occurs in the first
loop.

Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <redacted>
---
diff --git a/drivers/video/via/accel.c b/drivers/video/via/accel.c
index 632523f..45c54bf 100644
--- a/drivers/video/via/accel.c
+++ b/drivers/video/via/accel.c
@@ -267,13 +267,17 @@ int viafb_wait_engine_idle(void)
 	int loop = 0;
 
 	while (!(readl(viaparinfo->io_virt + VIA_REG_STATUS) &
-			VIA_VR_QUEUE_BUSY) && (loop++ < MAXLOOP))
+			VIA_VR_QUEUE_BUSY) && (loop < MAXLOOP)) {
+		loop++;
 		cpu_relax();
+	}
 
 	while ((readl(viaparinfo->io_virt + VIA_REG_STATUS) &
 		    (VIA_CMD_RGTR_BUSY | VIA_2D_ENG_BUSY | VIA_3D_ENG_BUSY)) &&
-		    (loop++ < MAXLOOP))
+		    (loop < MAXLOOP)) {
+		loop++;
 		cpu_relax();
+	}
 
 	return loop >= MAXLOOP;
 }

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help