On Fri, 7 May 2004, Ville [iso-8859-1] Syrjälä wrote:
This patch changes the memory type message to match reality. This agrees
with both my hardware and the Mobility register specs.
I took the values from the RAGE II+ manual. So ATI recycled the WRAM value for
Mobility? Unless they never actually made boards with WRAM.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to
deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 10:36:50AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Ville [iso-8859-1] Syrjälä wrote:
quoted
This patch changes the memory type message to match reality. This agrees
with both my hardware and the Mobility register specs.
I took the values from the RAGE II+ manual. So ATI recycled the WRAM value for
Mobility? Unless they never actually made boards with WRAM.
My Rage Pro manual lists WRAM in CONFIG_STAT2.CFG_MEM_TYPEb. And that's
the only place where WRAM in mentioned as a valid memory type in my
manuals. Also the values of CFG_MEM_TYPEb look like the xor of
CONFIG_STAT0.CFG_MEM_TYPE except that WRAM is CFG_MEM_TYPEb=001 and
CFG_MEM_TYPE=110 is listed as a reserved value.
--
Ville Syrjälä
syrjala@sci.fi
http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to
deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3