imsttfb warnings in 2.6.0-test4

From: Stephen M. Kenton <hidden>
Date: 2003-09-06 04:15:37

Any reason that imsttfb_load_cursor_image and imstt_set_cursor
can not be under the same #if 0 as imsttfb_cursor which used to call them?
It gets rid of a couple of defined but not used warnings in 2.6.0-test4
For that matter, is the #if 0  being kept for a particular reason?

Untested patch below

smk
--- drivers/video/imsttfb.c.ori	2003-09-05 22:34:18.000000000 -0500
+++ drivers/video/imsttfb.c	2003-09-05 22:35:36.000000000 -0500
@@ -1084,6 +1084,7 @@
 	while(read_reg_le32(par->dc_regs, SSTATUS) & 0x40);
 }
 
+#if 0
 static int
 imsttfb_load_cursor_image(struct imstt_par *par, int width, int height, __u8 fgc)
 {
@@ -1191,7 +1192,6 @@
 	}
 }
 
-#if 0
 static int 
 imsttfb_cursor(struct fb_info *info, struct fb_cursor *cursor)
 {



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help