On Sun, 4 May 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Summary of changes from v2.5.68 to v2.5.69
============================================
Ben Collins:
o [VIDEO]: Revert cfbimgblt.c back to a working state on 64-bit
o [VIDEO]: Revert atyfb back to known working clean base
For future changes, could you please run these `reversals' through
linux-fbdev-devel, instead of silently passing them behind our backs? Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
-------------------------------------------------------
Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 09:44:08PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Sun, 4 May 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted
Summary of changes from v2.5.68 to v2.5.69
============================================
Ben Collins:
o [VIDEO]: Revert cfbimgblt.c back to a working state on 64-bit
o [VIDEO]: Revert atyfb back to known working clean base
For future changes, could you please run these `reversals' through
linux-fbdev-devel, instead of silently passing them behind our backs? Thanks!
This was far from silent. These were discussed with James, DaveM and
Linus, and agreed to by James.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
-------------------------------------------------------
Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
On Wed, 7 May 2003, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Sun, 4 May 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted
Summary of changes from v2.5.68 to v2.5.69
============================================
Ben Collins:
o [VIDEO]: Revert cfbimgblt.c back to a working state on 64-bit
o [VIDEO]: Revert atyfb back to known working clean base
For future changes, could you please run these `reversals' through
linux-fbdev-devel, instead of silently passing them behind our backs? Thanks!
As mentioned already, this was done by several people, including the
maintainer.
But even if it wasn't, the fact is that new additions that break major
architectures _will_ be reverted. No ifs, buts or maybes about it. If new
code shows itself to be broken, it's going to get reverted, and the sooner
the better. And in this case, the code was not just slightly broken, it
was totally non-working, in ways that made it clear that it had NEVER
worked as intended.
Linus