Re: [BK PATCHS] fbdev updates.
From: Russell King <hidden>
Date: 2002-10-18 18:26:56
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 10:27:59AM -0700, James Simmons wrote:
Yes the drivers should always have priority. The other stuff is there only if the drivers have no power management of any kind. I leave it up to the driver write to implement a fb_blank function that handles different cases.
The drivers don't have priority though. You call set_par, and then wander off into the internals of fbgen.c to set can_soft_blank youself, without giving the drivers any look-in to set that correctly.
quoted
There is also the argument about wanting soft blanking, but hardware power saving.Hm. True unfortunely the fbdev layer lacks handling details like that. The console system is even worse. This is why a single flag like can_soft_blank can actually be a limitation.
Well, it needs to be fixed. We've lost functionality that was present in
2.4, and therefore I call it a bug.
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf