Re: 2.5 atyfb on Sparc question

On  8 Aug 02 at 11:16, James Simmons wrote:

quoted

I also hope that performance problems will be solved
before we are
forced to not use putcs.

It will be :-) I need to one align the data. Second I
plan to implement the patch recently posted here. 

Patch still showed about 100% slowdown against 2.4.x, if I interpreted
yesterday's table correctly. It is better than 1000% slowdown, but still...
                                                Petr
                                                


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

On  8 Aug 02 at 11:16, James Simmons wrote:

quoted

quoted

I also hope that performance problems will be solved
before we are
forced to not use putcs.

It will be :-) I need to one align the data. Second I
plan to implement the patch recently posted here.

Patch still showed about 100% slowdown against 2.4.x, if I interpreted
yesterday's table correctly. It is better than 1000% slowdown, but still...

I could believe a slow down of 2x but 1000 I don't think so.




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf