2.5 atyfb on Sparc question

7 messages, 4 authors, 2002-08-09 · open the first message on its own page

2.5 atyfb on Sparc question

From: Holzrichter, Bruce <hidden>
Date: 2002-08-06 15:31:18

Quick question..  I was wondering if there is still a bk tree for fbdev
work, or are you pushing direct to Linus?

I am getting the following errors when compiling on a sparc64 machine from
the latest BK 2.5 tree, and was wondering if a fix may already be around.  I
am not subscribed to this list, but a quick search didn't turn up anything.
Thanks in advance..

Thanks,
Bruce H. 

atyfb_base.c: In function `atyfb_set_dispsw':
atyfb_base.c:1098: warning: assignment discards `const' from pointer target
type
atyfb_base.c:1101: warning: assignment discards `const' from pointer target
type
atyfb_base.c:1105: warning: assignment discards `const' from pointer target
type
atyfb_base.c:1109: warning: assignment discards `const' from pointer target
type
atyfb_base.c: In function `atyfb_set_var':
atyfb_base.c:1191: warning: implicit declaration of function
`do_install_cmap'
atyfb_base.c: In function `atyfb_ioctl':
atyfb_base.c:1258: `info2' undeclared (first use in this function)
atyfb_base.c:1258: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
atyfb_base.c:1258: for each function it appears in.)
atyfb_base.c:1253: warning: `disp' might be used uninitialized in this
function
atyfb_base.c: In function `atyfb_save_palette':
atyfb_base.c:1447: warning: passing arg 2 of `aty_ld_8' from incompatible
pointer type
atyfb_base.c:1448: `par' undeclared (first use in this function)
atyfb_base.c:1450: warning: passing arg 3 of `aty_st_8' from incompatible
pointer type
atyfb_base.c:1451: warning: passing arg 3 of `aty_st_8' from incompatible
pointer type
atyfb_base.c: In function `atyfb_init':
atyfb_base.c:2204: parse error before `struct'
atyfb_base.c:2231: `default_par' undeclared (first use in this function)
atyfb_base.c:2261: `par' undeclared (first use in this function)
atyfb_base.c:2268: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a
cast
atyfb_base.c:2364: warning: passing arg 2 of `aty_ld_le32' from incompatible
pointer type
atyfb_base.c:2366: warning: passing arg 2 of `aty_ld_le32' from incompatible
pointer type
atyfb_base.c:2388: warning: passing arg 2 of `aty_ld_le32' from incompatible
pointer type
atyfb_base.c:2392: warning: passing arg 3 of `aty_st_le32' from incompatible
pointer type
atyfb_base.c:2434: warning: passing arg 2 of `aty_ld_le32' from incompatible
pointer type
atyfb_base.c:2437: warning: passing arg 2 of `aty_ld_le32' from incompatible
pointer type
atyfb_base.c:2439: warning: passing arg 2 of `aty_ld_le32' from incompatible
pointer type
atyfb_base.c:2442: warning: passing arg 2 of `aty_ld_le32' from incompatible
pointer type
atyfb_base.c:2444: warning: passing arg 2 of `aty_ld_le32' from incompatible
pointer type
atyfb_base.c:2455: warning: passing arg 2 of `aty_ld_8' from incompatible
pointer type
atyfb_base.c:2458: warning: passing arg 2 of `aty_ld_pll' from incompatible
pointer type
atyfb_base.c:2560: invalid operands to binary &
atyfb_base.c: At top level:
atyfb_base.c:136: warning: `atyfb_fix' defined but not used
make[3]: *** [atyfb_base.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/bruce/sparctest/drivers/video/aty'
make[2]: *** [aty] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/bruce/sparctest/drivers/video'
make[1]: *** [video] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/bruce/sparctest/drivers'
make: *** [drivers] Error 2


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: 2.5 atyfb on Sparc question

From: James Simmons <hidden>
Date: 2002-08-06 16:06:48

Quick question..  I was wondering if there is still
a bk tree for fbdev
work, or are you pushing direct to Linus?

I am getting the following errors when compiling on
a sparc64 machine from
the latest BK 2.5 tree, and was wondering if a fix
may already be around.  I
am not subscribed to this list, but a quick search
didn't turn up anything.
Thanks in advance..
Yes. I received a fix. I added to my BK repository but
I need to work on the driver a little bit more before
I push stuff. The next set of patches will break alot
of drivers but I need to do this to get people to port
there stuff over to the new api.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: 2.5 atyfb on Sparc question

From: Jani Monoses <hidden>
Date: 2002-08-07 07:43:15

On Tue, 6 Aug 2002 09:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
James Simmons [off-list ref] wrote:
I push stuff. The next set of patches will break alot
of drivers but I need to do this to get people to port
there stuff over to the new api.
Could you outline what the next set of patches will change?
Thanks
Jani.


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: 2.5 atyfb on Sparc question

From: James Simmons <hidden>
Date: 2002-08-08 18:21:43

--- Jani Monoses <jani@iv.ro> wrote:
On Tue, 6 Aug 2002 09:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
James Simmons [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I push stuff. The next set of patches will break
alot
quoted
of drivers but I need to do this to get people to
port
quoted
there stuff over to the new api.
Could you outline what the next set of patches will
change?
Thanks
Jani.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: 2.5 atyfb on Sparc question

From: James Simmons <hidden>
Date: 2002-08-08 18:25:20

quoted
quoted
I push stuff. The next set of patches will break
alot
quoted
of drivers but I need to do this to get people to
port
quoted
there stuff over to the new api.
Could you outline what the next set of patches will
change?
Oops. The next patch will remove get_fix and get_var. Also the internal
fbdev code will begin using the var and fix feilds in struct fb_info.




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: 2.5 atyfb on Sparc question

From: Jani Monoses <hidden>
Date: 2002-08-09 08:07:07

On Thu, 8 Aug 2002 11:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
James Simmons [off-list ref] wrote:
Oops. The next patch will remove get_fix and get_var. Also the internal
fbdev code will begin using the var and fix feilds in struct fb_info.
Is there a place (ruby tree ???) where this stuff can be seen before it goes to Linus?
I want to port my driver and would be nice to see how the final fb core looks like...
Jani.


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: 2.5 atyfb on Sparc question

From: James Simmons <hidden>
Date: 2002-08-09 17:19:13

quoted
Oops. The next patch will remove get_fix and get_var. Also the internal
fbdev code will begin using the var and fix feilds in struct fb_info.
Is there a place (ruby tree ???) where this stuff can be seen before it goes to Linus?
http://fbdev.bkbits.net:8080/fbdev-2.5
I want to port my driver and would be nice to see how the final fb core looks like...
Jani.




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help