Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ext4: add ioctl EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT
From: harshad shirwadkar <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-11 17:11:15
Leah pointed out that jbd2_journal_flush() function commits the currently running transaction. EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT calls jbd2_journal_flush() so unless I'm missing something, we're actually doing all the work that syncfs() would do from EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT ioctl before sending discards. Also, the journal commit that happens as a part of jbd2_journal_flush() is always a full commit. So, it sounds like we don't really need to do anything more here. Thanks Leah for pointing it out! On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 9:22 AM harshad shirwadkar [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ err = jbd2_journal_flush(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_journal,Huh. So we don't flush the filesystem at all, just the journal? I don't see anything in the documentation saying that syncfs() is a prerequisite.This is just for the journal, good point, I'll update the documentation.It just occurred to me this morning that we need to ensure that a *full* commit happens before IOC_CHECKPOINT and not a *fast* commit. Fast commits cannot be checkpointed, they rely on full commits for checkpoint operation. So, if a syncfs call results in a fast commit, the following sequence of events will happen: * Ext4 writes fast commit information in fast commit area * When user calls EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT, the checkpoint operation would result in checkpointing everything in the main journal, except things written in fast commit area * During the discard phase of EXT4_IOC_CHECKPOINT, fast commit area will be discarded and thus we'll lose the log updates present in the fast commit area However, this isn't a problem today. Syncfs doesn't result in a fast commit but results in a full commit. But, that can change at some point in the future. So, unless we can either come up with syncfs() variant that can induce a full commit (which would be a little ugly - I don't think the user needs to know what kind of journal commit file system is doing) or add checkpointing support in fast commits, we should just do a full commit from the IOCTL code. - Harshad