+ jbd-fix-assertion-failure-in-fs-jbd-checkpointc.patch added to -mm tree
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Date: 2007-11-29 22:18:55
The patch titled
jbd: Fix assertion failure in fs/jbd/checkpoint.c
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
jbd-fix-assertion-failure-in-fs-jbd-checkpointc.patch
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: jbd: Fix assertion failure in fs/jbd/checkpoint.c
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Before we start committing a transaction, we call
__journal_clean_checkpoint_list() to cleanup transaction's written-back
buffers.
If this call happens to remove all of them (and there were already some
buffers), __journal_remove_checkpoint() will decide to free the transaction
because it isn't (yet) a committing transaction and soon we fail some
assertion - the transaction really isn't ready to be freed :).
We change the check in __journal_remove_checkpoint() to free only a
transaction in T_FINISHED state. The locking there is subtle though (as
everywhere in JBD ;(). We use j_list_lock to protect the check and a
subsequent call to __journal_drop_transaction() and do the same in the end
of journal_commit_transaction() which is the only place where a transaction
can get to T_FINISHED state.
Probably I'm too paranoid here and such locking is not really necessary -
checkpoint lists are processed only from log_do_checkpoint() where a
transaction must be already committed to be processed or from
__journal_clean_checkpoint_list() where kjournald itself calls it and thus
transaction cannot change state either. Better be safe if something
changes in future...
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/jbd/checkpoint.c | 12 ++++++------
fs/jbd/commit.c | 8 ++++----
include/linux/jbd.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/jbd/checkpoint.c~jbd-fix-assertion-failure-in-fs-jbd-checkpointc fs/jbd/checkpoint.c--- a/fs/jbd/checkpoint.c~jbd-fix-assertion-failure-in-fs-jbd-checkpointc
+++ a/fs/jbd/checkpoint.c@@ -602,15 +602,15 @@ int __journal_remove_checkpoint(struct j /* * There is one special case to worry about: if we have just pulled the - * buffer off a committing transaction's forget list, then even if the - * checkpoint list is empty, the transaction obviously cannot be - * dropped! + * buffer off a running or committing transaction's checkpoing list, + * then even if the checkpoint list is empty, the transaction obviously + * cannot be dropped! * - * The locking here around j_committing_transaction is a bit sleazy. + * The locking here around t_state is a bit sleazy. * See the comment at the end of journal_commit_transaction(). */ - if (transaction == journal->j_committing_transaction) { - JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "belongs to committing transaction"); + if (transaction->t_state != T_FINISHED) { + JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "belongs to running/committing transaction"); goto out; }
diff -puN fs/jbd/commit.c~jbd-fix-assertion-failure-in-fs-jbd-checkpointc fs/jbd/commit.c
--- a/fs/jbd/commit.c~jbd-fix-assertion-failure-in-fs-jbd-checkpointc
+++ a/fs/jbd/commit.c@@ -858,10 +858,10 @@ restart_loop: } spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock); /* - * This is a bit sleazy. We borrow j_list_lock to protect - * journal->j_committing_transaction in __journal_remove_checkpoint. - * Really, __journal_remove_checkpoint should be using j_state_lock but - * it's a bit hassle to hold that across __journal_remove_checkpoint + * This is a bit sleazy. We use j_list_lock to protect transition + * of a transaction into T_FINISHED state and calling + * __journal_drop_transaction(). Otherwise we could race with + * other checkpointing code processing the transaction... */ spin_lock(&journal->j_state_lock); spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
diff -puN include/linux/jbd.h~jbd-fix-assertion-failure-in-fs-jbd-checkpointc include/linux/jbd.h
--- a/include/linux/jbd.h~jbd-fix-assertion-failure-in-fs-jbd-checkpointc
+++ a/include/linux/jbd.h@@ -439,6 +439,8 @@ struct transaction_s /* * Transaction's current state * [no locking - only kjournald alters this] + * [j_list_lock] guards transition of a transaction into T_FINISHED + * state and subsequent call of __journal_drop_transaction() * FIXME: needs barriers * KLUDGE: [use j_state_lock] */
_ Patches currently in -mm which might be from jack@suse.cz are origin.patch jbd-fix-assertion-failure-in-fs-jbd-checkpointc.patch a.patch inotify-send-in_attrib-events-when-link-count-changes.patch r-o-bind-mounts-elevate-write-count-for-some-ioctls-vs-forbid-user-to-change-file-flags-on-quota-files.patch iget-stop-ext3-from-using-iget-and-read_inode-try.patch iget-stop-ext3-from-using-iget-and-read_inode-try-checkpatch-fixes.patch iget-stop-ext4-from-using-iget-and-read_inode-try.patch