Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: 2012-10-31 17:37:56
Also in:
lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2012-11-08 · Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support · Alan Cox <hidden>
- 2012-11-08 · Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support · James Courtier-Dutton <hidden>
- 2012-11-07 · Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support · Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
- 2012-11-06 · Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support · Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
- 2012-11-06 · Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support · Alan Cox <hidden>
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:39:19PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:17:43 +0000 Matthew Garrett [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
By booting a signed kernel, not turning on swap and writing directly to the swap partition.Ok so the actual problem is that you are signing kernels that allow the user to skip the S4 resume check ?
What S4 resume check? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org