# Re: \[PATCH v12 13/22\] selftests/vm: powerpc implementation for generic abstraction

- From: Dave Hansen \<hidden\>
- Date: 2018-03-16 22:23:38 
- List: linux-doc
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-doc/2018/03/5218940
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-kselftest/2018/02/5195852/t.md

```text
On 02/21/2018 05:55 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
>  static inline u32 pkey_to_shift(int pkey)
>  {
> +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) /* arch */
>  	return pkey * PKEY_BITS_PER_PKEY;
> +#elif __powerpc64__ /* arch */
> +	return (NR_PKEYS - pkey - 1) * PKEY_BITS_PER_PKEY;
> +#endif /* arch */
>  }

I really detest the #if #else style.  Can't we just have a pkey_ppc.h
and a pkey_x86.h or something?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
```