Re: [PATCH v2 02/14] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996: Drop RPM bus clocks
From: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com>
Date: 2023-09-13 10:18:00
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-iommu, linux-remoteproc, linux-usb, lkml
On 12/09/2023 4:31 pm, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
quoted hunk
These clocks are now handled from within the icc framework and are no longer registered from within the CCF. Remove them. Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <redacted> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi | 27 ++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi index c8e0986425ab..acef67ab0581 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi@@ -798,9 +798,6 @@ bimc: interconnect@408000 { compatible = "qcom,msm8996-bimc"; reg = <0x00408000 0x5a000>; #interconnect-cells = <1>; - clock-names = "bus", "bus_a"; - clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_BIMC_CLK>, - <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_BIMC_A_CLK>; }; tsens0: thermal-sensor@4a9000 {@@ -851,18 +848,12 @@ cnoc: interconnect@500000 { compatible = "qcom,msm8996-cnoc"; reg = <0x00500000 0x1000>; #interconnect-cells = <1>; - clock-names = "bus", "bus_a"; - clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_CNOC_CLK>, - <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_CNOC_A_CLK>; }; snoc: interconnect@524000 { compatible = "qcom,msm8996-snoc"; reg = <0x00524000 0x1c000>; #interconnect-cells = <1>; - clock-names = "bus", "bus_a"; - clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_SNOC_CLK>, - <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_SNOC_A_CLK>; }; a0noc: interconnect@543000 {@@ -882,19 +873,14 @@ a1noc: interconnect@562000 { compatible = "qcom,msm8996-a1noc"; reg = <0x00562000 0x5000>; #interconnect-cells = <1>; - clock-names = "bus", "bus_a"; - clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_AGGR1_NOC_CLK>, - <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_AGGR1_NOC_A_CLK>; }; a2noc: interconnect@583000 { compatible = "qcom,msm8996-a2noc"; reg = <0x00583000 0x7000>; #interconnect-cells = <1>; - clock-names = "bus", "bus_a", "aggre2_ufs_axi", "ufs_axi"; - clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_AGGR2_NOC_CLK>, - <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_AGGR2_NOC_A_CLK>, - <&gcc GCC_AGGRE2_UFS_AXI_CLK>, + clock-names = "aggre2_ufs_axi", "ufs_axi"; + clocks = <&gcc GCC_AGGRE2_UFS_AXI_CLK>, <&gcc GCC_UFS_AXI_CLK>; };@@ -902,19 +888,14 @@ mnoc: interconnect@5a4000 { compatible = "qcom,msm8996-mnoc"; reg = <0x005a4000 0x1c000>; #interconnect-cells = <1>; - clock-names = "bus", "bus_a", "iface"; - clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_MMAXI_CLK>, - <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_MMAXI_A_CLK>, - <&mmcc AHB_CLK_SRC>; + clock-names = "iface"; + clocks = <&mmcc AHB_CLK_SRC>; }; pnoc: interconnect@5c0000 { compatible = "qcom,msm8996-pnoc"; reg = <0x005c0000 0x3000>; #interconnect-cells = <1>; - clock-names = "bus", "bus_a"; - clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_PCNOC_CLK>, - <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_PCNOC_A_CLK>; }; tcsr_mutex: hwlock@740000 {
Tested-by: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@protonmail.com>