Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] pinctrl: renesas: pinctrl-rzg2l: Add support to get/set pin config for GPIO port pins
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2021-11-09 15:00:22
Also in:
linux-gpio, linux-renesas-soc, lkml
Hi Prabhakar, On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 3:31 PM Lad, Prabhakar [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 3:36 PM Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 2:44 PM Lad Prabhakar [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Add support to get/set pin config for GPIO port pins. Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>Thanks for your patch!quoted
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.cquoted
@@ -495,6 +512,14 @@ static int rzg2l_pinctrl_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, port = RZG2L_SINGLE_PIN_GET_PORT(*pin_data); cfg = RZG2L_SINGLE_PIN_GET_CFGS(*pin_data); bit = RZG2L_SINGLE_PIN_GET_BIT(*pin_data); + } else { + cfg = RZG2L_GPIO_PORT_GET_CFGS(*pin_data); + port = RZG2L_PIN_ID_TO_PORT(_pin); + bit = RZG2L_PIN_ID_TO_PIN(_pin); + port_pin = true;Instead of setting this flag, perhaps port should be adjusted?Something like below? #define RZG2L_PORT_START_OFFSET 0x10 port = RZG2L_PIN_ID_TO_PORT_pin) + RZG2L_PORT_START_OFFSET; rzg2l_validate_gpio_pin(pctrl, *pin_data, port - RZG2L_PORT_START_OFFSET, bit)
Or adjust port after the call to rzg2l_validate_gpio_pin(), to avoid adding the offset first, and subtracting it again for calling the latter?
and rename port -> port_offset in rzg2l_pinctrl_pinconf_get/set
That makes sense. Currently "port" has two meanings: it can mean either the GPIO port index, or the global register index covering both single function pin groups and GPIO port indices. RZG2L_SINGLE_PIN_GET_PORT() returns the latter. RZG2L_PIN_ID_TO_PORT() returns the former, thus needing an extra offset to convert to the global register index.
Or would you prefer to change the RZG2L_PIN_ID_TO_PORT macro and adjust the entire file?
Changing RZG2L_PIN_ID_TO_PORT() would imply changing all macros accessing GPIO registers, and is thus quite intrusive.
quoted
Then rzg2l_r{ead,mw}_pin_config() don't have to care about that anymore.Agreed.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds