From: Serge Semin <redacted>
Indeed there are a log of trivial devices amongst platform controllers,
IP-blocks, etc. If they satisfy the trivial devices bindings requirements
like consisting of a compatible field, an address and possibly an interrupt
line why not having them in the generic trivial-devices bindings file?
We only need to accordingly alter the bindings title and description nodes.
Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Malahov <redacted>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: Paul Burton <paulburton@kernel.org>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <redacted>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml
index 978de7d37c66..ce0149b4b6ed 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml
@@ -4,15 +4,15 @@
$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/trivial-devices.yaml#
$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
-title: Trivial I2C and SPI devices that have simple device tree bindings
+title: Trivial I2C, SPI and platform devices having simple device tree bindings
maintainers:
- Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
description: |
- This is a list of trivial I2C and SPI devices that have simple device tree
- bindings, consisting only of a compatible field, an address and possibly an
- interrupt line.
+ This is a list of trivial I2C, SPI and platform devices that have simple
+ device tree bindings, consisting only of a compatible field, an address and
+ possibly an interrupt line.
If a device needs more specific bindings, such as properties to
describe some aspect of it, there needs to be a specific binding
--
2.25.1