Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-08-04

Re: [PATCH 08/12] i2c: core: Add support for 'i2c-bus' subnode

From: Tomeu Vizoso <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-04 06:25:39
Also in: dri-devel, linux-gpio, linux-i2c, linux-tegra

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On 2 August 2016 at 08:49, Jon Hunter [off-list ref] wrote:
On 02/08/16 07:26, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
quoted
On 23 June 2016 at 17:59, Jon Hunter [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
If the 'i2c-bus' device-tree node is present for an I2C adapter then
parse this subnode for I2C slaves.

Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
index 952d2f0c02c5..71ad532be1d8 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
@@ -1452,7 +1452,7 @@ static struct i2c_client *of_i2c_register_device(struct i2c_adapter *adap,

 static void of_i2c_register_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
 {
-       struct device_node *node;
+       struct device_node *bus, *node;

        /* Only register child devices if the adapter has a node pointer set */
        if (!adap->dev.of_node)
@@ -1460,11 +1460,17 @@ static void of_i2c_register_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap)

        dev_dbg(&adap->dev, "of_i2c: walking child nodes\n");

-       for_each_available_child_of_node(adap->dev.of_node, node) {
+       bus = of_get_child_by_name(adap->dev.of_node, "i2c-bus");
+       if (!bus)
+               bus = of_node_get(adap->dev.of_node);
+
+       for_each_available_child_of_node(bus, node) {
                if (of_node_test_and_set_flag(node, OF_POPULATED))
                        continue;
                of_i2c_register_device(adap, node);
        }
+
+       of_node_put(bus);
 }
Sorry for not commenting earlier, but I only found the issue yesterday.

I'm bothered as well by the "modalias failure" error message but in my
case the node doesn't have any i2c devices, so this patch isn't a
complete solution to that problem.
But it is a i2c adapter correct? I guess I don't completely understand
the problem?
quoted
Has this been considered already?
Why can't you add a place-holder 'i2c-bus' node for i2c devices so when
they are adding in the future they are placed under this node? This is
what I did for dpaux. See patch 12/12 of this series.
Hadn't realized, and it sounds good enough to me.

Thanks,

Tomeu
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help