RE: [PATCH v2 6/6] devicetree: bindings: Document Renesas JPEG Processing Unit.

Get me off this flocking mail list.  The unsubscribe email method is not working... 

-----Original Message-----
From: "Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Sent: ‎8/‎25/‎2014 8:04 PM
To: "Simon Horman" <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: "Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>; "Mikhail Ulyanov" <redacted>; "Magnus Damm" <magnus.damm@gmail.com>; "Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <redacted>; "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>; "Grant Likely" <redacted>; "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>; "Ian Campbell" <redacted>; "Hans Verkuil" <redacted>; "Linux-sh list" <redacted>; "Linux Media Mailing List" <redacted>; "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <redacted>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] devicetree: bindings: Document Renesas JPEG Processing Unit.

Hi Simon,

On Tuesday 26 August 2014 08:57:20 Simon Horman wrote:

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:59:46PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Mikhail Ulyanov wrote:

quoted

+  - compatible: should containg one of the following:
+                       - "renesas,jpu-r8a7790" for R-Car H2
+                       - "renesas,jpu-r8a7791" for R-Car M2
+                       - "renesas,jpu-gen2" for R-Car second generation

Isn't "renesas,jpu-gen2" meant as a fallback?

I.e. the DTS should have one of '7790 and '7791, AND the gen2 fallback,
so we can make the driver match against '7790 and '7791 is we find
out about an incompatibility.

Is there a document that clearly states that there is such a thing
as jpu-gen2 in hardware? If not I would prefer not to add a binding for it.

How about going the other way around and requesting that document ?

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html