Thread (92 messages) 92 messages, 11 authors, 2014-08-29

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/9] dt: deps: dependency based device creation

From: Alexander Shiyan <hidden>
Date: 2014-05-16 17:31:20

Wed, 14 May 2014 23:10:39 +0200 от Alexander Holler [off-list ref]:
Am 14.05.2014 22:06, schrieb Grant Likely:
quoted
On Wed, 14 May 2014 16:49:05 +0200, Alexander Holler [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Am 14.05.2014 16:05, schrieb Grant Likely:
quoted
On Mon, 12 May 2014 18:47:53 +0200, Alexander Holler [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
Hmm, I don't really care if that will be merged. I have no motivation to 
fight with Linux kernel maintainers and I don't know if I will spend the 
necessary time to do so.
The people you need to convince are Rob, Greg, and me, and you've got my
attention. If I'm convinced, then I can probably convince Greg also.
You've got an interesting approach, and I hope you won't give up on it.
Sorry, but that point of the view is already a problem. Why do I have to
convince you people?

To summarize:

Linux kernel maintainers

- don't like code they haven't written theirself,
- don't like code which doesn't look like they have written it theirself,
- don't like ideas they haven't had themself,
- do feel good in their closed group they have formed,
...
Very correct and well said.
For many subsystems is it as is, we cannot break these barriers.

---
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help