Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 3 authors, 2013-08-05

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mfd: palmas: Add power off control

From: Bill Huang <hidden>
Date: 2013-08-05 10:33:56
Also in: lkml

On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 22:39 +0800, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 08/02/2013 12:45 AM, Bill Huang wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 21:08 +0800, Nishanth Menon wrote:
quoted
On 04:08-20130801, Bill Huang wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 19:57 +0800, Nishanth Menon wrote:
quoted
If you notice the reference code I send, atleast on TWL6035/37 variants
of Palmas, USB IRQ unmask is mandatory for power on with USB cable -
example usage scenario: extremely low battery, device powered off, plug
in usb cable to restart charging - you'd like to initiate charging logic
in bootloader, but that wont work if the device does not do OFF-ON
transition with usb cable plugged in for vbus.
Why do we need to add Palmas USB_IRQ unmask logic in shutdown? Does that
mean for all platform using Palmas has to unmask USB IRQ (including
those do not power vbus through Palmas)? Can't we just have a simple
shutdown function but have the VBus programming been done in USB driver
or maybe platform driver since it is platform specific control?
we dont have a irq cleanup, irq handling is done in palmas-mfd. Further,

Why would USB driver care about vbus supply needs in complete power off
- it is the job of palmas driver? Further, palmas-mfd shutdown
handler(currently missing) if probably cleansup things:

  mfd_remove_devices(palmas->dev);
   palmas_irq_exit(palmas);

shutdown sequence becomes complicated further esp if things are
cleanedup in shutdown (Dummy patch[1]).


All I am saying is this: shutdown should allow powerup functionality to
work as well, how we do that is upto us - I personally found it a little
easier to keep the IRQ unmask in shutdown easier to deal with, but other
options might be possible as well.
I'm not sure if I understand your comments completely (maybe due to I'm
not familiar with the mechanism of unmasking USB IRQ in Palmas driver)
This is IMHO an weird configuration I saw on TWL6035/6037 Palmas device 
- so I suspect should be the case in probably other palmas devices as 
well. I hit power off, and I can start up the device again by supplying 
vbus -(usecase was, at that point in time, battery charging)

anyways, I was working with busybox and no usb driver even enabled, but 
I am told by the twl6035/7 support folks that due to design USB IRQ 
needs to be unmasked at shutdown/poweroff to allow OFF->ON transition 
sequence to start inside Palmas when vbus is supplied.

quoted
but doing cleanup in each driver shutdown handler makes sense to me, if
those clean up can be done in shutdown then we can make power off
function as simple as possible and being part of Palmas mfd driver?
not really, mfd shutdown does not guarantee rest of the drivers' 
shutdown functions are safely called, pm_power_off unfortunately is the 
only "official point" where we can safely and cleanly shutdown the system.
It looks to me whether or not adding those extra control in a generic
Palmas driver is still in doubt, will you send your patch for this in
the near future? If not, any objection on making it as a basic and
simple power off control (that said, any further processing which has to
be in power off routine can be added on top of that, or can be moved to
be under drivers/reset if needed) using the existing mechanism?

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help