Re: [RFC V1 2/4] dts/imx6q: add cpufreq property

2 messages, 2 authors, 2011-12-16 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [RFC V1 2/4] dts/imx6q: add cpufreq property

From: Shawn Guo <hidden>
Date: 2011-12-15 11:58:54

Hi Richard,

Whenever we invent some new device tree binding support, we need to
Cc devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org (Cc-ed).

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:16:36PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
quoted hunk
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
index 263e8f3..9e9943b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
 			compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
 			reg = <0>;
 			next-level-cache = <&L2>;
+			cpu_freqs = <996000000 792000000 396000000 198000000>;
+			cpu_volts = <1225000 1100000 950000 850000>;
For dt property name, we use '-' rather than '_'.

And I'm not sure this is correct, since these data obviously does not
belong to "arm,cortex-a9".

Regards,
Shawn
 		};
 
 		cpu@1 {
-- 
1.7.5.4

Re: [RFC V1 2/4] dts/imx6q: add cpufreq property

From: Richard Zhao <hidden>
Date: 2011-12-16 02:47:31

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:58:54PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
Hi Richard,

Whenever we invent some new device tree binding support, we need to
Cc devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org (Cc-ed).
Thanks for your reminder.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:16:36PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
quoted
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
index 263e8f3..9e9943b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
 			compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
 			reg = <0>;
 			next-level-cache = <&L2>;
+			cpu_freqs = <996000000 792000000 396000000 198000000>;
+			cpu_volts = <1225000 1100000 950000 850000>;
For dt property name, we use '-' rather than '_'.
ok.
And I'm not sure this is correct, since these data obviously does not
belong to "arm,cortex-a9".
That's why RFC.

Thanks
Richard
Regards,
Shawn
quoted
 		};
 
 		cpu@1 {
-- 
1.7.5.4

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help