# Re: \[PATCH\] mailbox: arm\_mhuv2: make remove callback return void

- From: Viresh Kumar \<viresh.kumar@linaro.org\>
- Date: 2021-02-03 02:59:13 
- List: linux-crypto
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-crypto/2021/02/6256515
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-fbdev/2021/01/6248565/t.md

```text
On 02-02-21, 20:43, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> My build tests failed to catch that amba driver that would have needed
> adaption in commit 3fd269e74f2f ("amba: Make the remove callback return
> void"). Change the remove function to make the driver build again.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <redacted>
> Fixes: 3fd269e74f2f ("amba: Make the remove callback return void")
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <redacted>
> ---
> Hello,
> 
> I guess I missed that driver during rebase as it was only introduced in
> the last merge window. Sorry for that.
> 
> I'm unsure what is the right thing to do now. Should I redo the pull
> request (with this patch squashed into 3fd269e74f2f)? Or do we just
> apply this patch on top?
> 
> FTR, the test robot report is at https://lore.kernel.org/r/202102030343.D9j1wukx-lkp@intel.com
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
>  drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c b/drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c
> index 67fb10885bb4..6cf1991a5c9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/arm_mhuv2.c
> @@ -1095,14 +1095,12 @@ static int mhuv2_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static int mhuv2_remove(struct amba_device *adev)
> +static void mhuv2_remove(struct amba_device *adev)
>  {
>  	struct mhuv2 *mhu = amba_get_drvdata(adev);
>  
>  	if (mhu->frame == SENDER_FRAME)
>  		writel_relaxed(0x0, &mhu->send->access_request);
> -
> -	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static struct amba_id mhuv2_ids[] = {

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh
```