Re: [PATCH ubdsrv] tgt_null: Return number of sectors read/written

2 messages, 2 authors, 2022-06-27 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH ubdsrv] tgt_null: Return number of sectors read/written

From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <hidden>
Date: 2022-06-22 16:24:26

Ming Lei [off-list ref] writes:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 06:48:39PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
quoted
Hi Ming,

I wrote this against your devel-v3 branch.  I'm wondering if you plan to
send a new version of the kernel patch soon? From the latest
Yeah, that is on my todo list:

https://github.com/ming1/linux/commits/my_for-5.19-ubd-devel_v3

there has lots cleanup & improvement.
quoted
discussions, I don't think there were major issues found on review. :)
One problem is the driver name, and Christoph thought we have
'arch/um/drivers/ubd*.c'. Not thought of one good candidate yet.
Hi Ming,

Thanks for the info, and sorry for not noticing the fix merged on Jun, 3rd
on the master branch.  I will follow that branch when testing and submit
fixes I find along the way.

I guess you have considered a lot of names, but I'd suggest any of:

 * blkuser,
 * ublk
 * BUSE (as in Block FUSE, though there is another non-upstream
project with that name),
 * UBIO (as in UIO, but for Block IO)
 * B2U (Block IO Backed by userspace) :-P

TBH, my favorite is ublk.

Thank you,

-- 
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi

Re: [PATCH ubdsrv] tgt_null: Return number of sectors read/written

From: Ming Lei <hidden>
Date: 2022-06-27 07:46:49

On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 12:23:42PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
Ming Lei [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 06:48:39PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
quoted
Hi Ming,

I wrote this against your devel-v3 branch.  I'm wondering if you plan to
send a new version of the kernel patch soon? From the latest
Yeah, that is on my todo list:

https://github.com/ming1/linux/commits/my_for-5.19-ubd-devel_v3

there has lots cleanup & improvement.
quoted
discussions, I don't think there were major issues found on review. :)
One problem is the driver name, and Christoph thought we have
'arch/um/drivers/ubd*.c'. Not thought of one good candidate yet.
Hi Ming,

Thanks for the info, and sorry for not noticing the fix merged on Jun, 3rd
on the master branch.  I will follow that branch when testing and submit
fixes I find along the way.
That is great!
I guess you have considered a lot of names, but I'd suggest any of:

 * blkuser,
 * ublk
 * BUSE (as in Block FUSE, though there is another non-upstream
project with that name),
 * UBIO (as in UIO, but for Block IO)
 * B2U (Block IO Backed by userspace) :-P

TBH, my favorite is ublk.
Me too, will change to it in v3 if no one objects.

Thanks,
Ming
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help