# Re: \[PATCH 07/29\] target/iblock: use bdev\_nr\_sectors instead of open coding it

- From: Bodo Stroesser \<bostroesser@gmail.com\>
- Date: 2021-10-13 09:31:25 
- List: linux-block
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-block/2021/10/215877
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-block/2021/10/215820/t.md

```text
On 13.10.21 07:10, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Use the proper helper to read the block device size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>   drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c | 5 +++--
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> index 31df20abe141f..ab7f5678ebc44 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> @@ -232,8 +232,9 @@ static unsigned long long iblock_emulate_read_cap_with_block_size(
>   	struct block_device *bd,
>   	struct request_queue *q)
>   {
> -	unsigned long long blocks_long = (div_u64(i_size_read(bd->bd_inode),
> -					bdev_logical_block_size(bd)) - 1);
> +	loff_t size = bdev_nr_sectors(bd) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> +	unsigned long long blocks_long =
> +		div_u64(size, bdev_logical_block_size(bd)) - 1;
>   	u32 block_size = bdev_logical_block_size(bd);

To enhance readability, would it make sense to shift the new lines
behind "u32 block_size = ...", so block_size can be used in div_u64
instead of using bdev_logical_block_size twice?

>   
>   	if (block_size == dev->dev_attrib.block_size)
>
```
