[PATCH v2] block: Try to handle busy underlying device on discard

Subsystems: filesystems (vfs and infrastructure), the rest

STALE2058d

5 messages, 3 authors, 2021-03-05 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH v2] block: Try to handle busy underlying device on discard

From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date: 2021-02-22 09:49:06

Commit 384d87ef2c95 ("block: Do not discard buffers under a mounted
filesystem") made paths issuing discard or zeroout requests to the
underlying device try to grab block device in exclusive mode. If that
failed we returned EBUSY to userspace. This however caused unexpected
fallout in userspace where e.g. FUSE filesystems issue discard requests
from userspace daemons although the device is open exclusively by the
kernel. Also shrinking of logical volume by LVM issues discard requests
to a device which may be claimed exclusively because there's another LV
on the same PV. So to avoid these userspace regressions, fall back to
invalidate_inode_pages2_range() instead of returning EBUSY to userspace
and return EBUSY only of that call fails as well (meaning that there's
indeed someone using the particular device range we are trying to
discard).

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211167
Fixes: 384d87ef2c95 ("block: Do not discard buffers under a mounted filesystem")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 fs/block_dev.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 235b5042672e..c33151020bcd 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -118,13 +118,22 @@ int truncate_bdev_range(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
 	if (!(mode & FMODE_EXCL)) {
 		int err = bd_prepare_to_claim(bdev, truncate_bdev_range);
 		if (err)
-			return err;
+			goto invalidate;
 	}
 
 	truncate_inode_pages_range(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, lstart, lend);
 	if (!(mode & FMODE_EXCL))
 		bd_abort_claiming(bdev, truncate_bdev_range);
 	return 0;
+
+invalidate:
+	/*
+	 * Someone else has handle exclusively open. Try invalidating instead.
+	 * The 'end' argument is inclusive so the rounding is safe.
+	 */
+	return invalidate_inode_pages2_range(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping,
+					     lstart >> PAGE_SHIFT,
+					     lend >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(truncate_bdev_range);
 
-- 
2.26.2

Re: [PATCH v2] block: Try to handle busy underlying device on discard

From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date: 2021-02-22 12:00:40

On Mon 22-02-21 10:48:09, Jan Kara wrote:
Commit 384d87ef2c95 ("block: Do not discard buffers under a mounted
filesystem") made paths issuing discard or zeroout requests to the
underlying device try to grab block device in exclusive mode. If that
failed we returned EBUSY to userspace. This however caused unexpected
fallout in userspace where e.g. FUSE filesystems issue discard requests
from userspace daemons although the device is open exclusively by the
kernel. Also shrinking of logical volume by LVM issues discard requests
to a device which may be claimed exclusively because there's another LV
on the same PV. So to avoid these userspace regressions, fall back to
invalidate_inode_pages2_range() instead of returning EBUSY to userspace
and return EBUSY only of that call fails as well (meaning that there's
indeed someone using the particular device range we are trying to
discard).

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211167
Fixes: 384d87ef2c95 ("block: Do not discard buffers under a mounted filesystem")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Before I forget: I'd like to add two tested by tags to give credit to
people who helped with testing.

Tested-by: Richard W.M. Jones <redacted>
Tested-by: Andreas Klauer <redacted>

									Honza
quoted hunk
---
 fs/block_dev.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 235b5042672e..c33151020bcd 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -118,13 +118,22 @@ int truncate_bdev_range(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
 	if (!(mode & FMODE_EXCL)) {
 		int err = bd_prepare_to_claim(bdev, truncate_bdev_range);
 		if (err)
-			return err;
+			goto invalidate;
 	}
 
 	truncate_inode_pages_range(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, lstart, lend);
 	if (!(mode & FMODE_EXCL))
 		bd_abort_claiming(bdev, truncate_bdev_range);
 	return 0;
+
+invalidate:
+	/*
+	 * Someone else has handle exclusively open. Try invalidating instead.
+	 * The 'end' argument is inclusive so the rounding is safe.
+	 */
+	return invalidate_inode_pages2_range(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping,
+					     lstart >> PAGE_SHIFT,
+					     lend >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(truncate_bdev_range);
 
-- 
2.26.2
-- 
Jan Kara [off-list ref]
SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH v2] block: Try to handle busy underlying device on discard

From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date: 2021-03-04 12:04:01

On Mon 22-02-21 10:48:09, Jan Kara wrote:
Commit 384d87ef2c95 ("block: Do not discard buffers under a mounted
filesystem") made paths issuing discard or zeroout requests to the
underlying device try to grab block device in exclusive mode. If that
failed we returned EBUSY to userspace. This however caused unexpected
fallout in userspace where e.g. FUSE filesystems issue discard requests
from userspace daemons although the device is open exclusively by the
kernel. Also shrinking of logical volume by LVM issues discard requests
to a device which may be claimed exclusively because there's another LV
on the same PV. So to avoid these userspace regressions, fall back to
invalidate_inode_pages2_range() instead of returning EBUSY to userspace
and return EBUSY only of that call fails as well (meaning that there's
indeed someone using the particular device range we are trying to
discard).

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211167
Fixes: 384d87ef2c95 ("block: Do not discard buffers under a mounted filesystem")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Ping guys? Can we get this reviewed and merged? Thanks!

								Honza
quoted hunk
---
 fs/block_dev.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 235b5042672e..c33151020bcd 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -118,13 +118,22 @@ int truncate_bdev_range(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
 	if (!(mode & FMODE_EXCL)) {
 		int err = bd_prepare_to_claim(bdev, truncate_bdev_range);
 		if (err)
-			return err;
+			goto invalidate;
 	}
 
 	truncate_inode_pages_range(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, lstart, lend);
 	if (!(mode & FMODE_EXCL))
 		bd_abort_claiming(bdev, truncate_bdev_range);
 	return 0;
+
+invalidate:
+	/*
+	 * Someone else has handle exclusively open. Try invalidating instead.
+	 * The 'end' argument is inclusive so the rounding is safe.
+	 */
+	return invalidate_inode_pages2_range(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping,
+					     lstart >> PAGE_SHIFT,
+					     lend >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(truncate_bdev_range);
 
-- 
2.26.2
-- 
Jan Kara [off-list ref]
SUSE Labs, CR

Re: [PATCH v2] block: Try to handle busy underlying device on discard

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2021-03-05 13:14:17

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Re: [PATCH v2] block: Try to handle busy underlying device on discard

From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: 2021-03-05 18:28:31

On 2/22/21 2:48 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
Commit 384d87ef2c95 ("block: Do not discard buffers under a mounted
filesystem") made paths issuing discard or zeroout requests to the
underlying device try to grab block device in exclusive mode. If that
failed we returned EBUSY to userspace. This however caused unexpected
fallout in userspace where e.g. FUSE filesystems issue discard requests
from userspace daemons although the device is open exclusively by the
kernel. Also shrinking of logical volume by LVM issues discard requests
to a device which may be claimed exclusively because there's another LV
on the same PV. So to avoid these userspace regressions, fall back to
invalidate_inode_pages2_range() instead of returning EBUSY to userspace
and return EBUSY only of that call fails as well (meaning that there's
indeed someone using the particular device range we are trying to
discard).
This missed -rc2, but I'll queue it up for -rc3.

-- 
Jens Axboe
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help