# Re: \[PATCH\] bcache: remove the redundant judgment on bi\_size

- From: Xifengfei \<hidden\>
- Date: 2021-08-31 02:05:55 
- List: linux-bcache
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-bcache/2021/08/1492833
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-bcache/2021/08/1492833/t.md

```text
OK. Thanks for our explanation.   ^_^

Feng fei

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Coly Li [mailto:colyli@suse.de] 
发送时间: 2021年8月31日 9:35
收件人: xifengfei (RD) [ref]
抄送: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kent.overstreet@gmail.com
主题: Re: [PATCH] bcache: remove the redundant judgment on bi_size

On 8/30/21 2:29 PM, Xifengfei wrote:
> （Sorry, there was an obvious typo in the last email）
> Thanks a lot. I understand the purpose.
> So is the original judgment process too complicated?  Can we judge 
> bi_size directly?  This will be more concise
>
> @@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static bool check_should_bypass(struct cached_dev *dc, struct bio *bio)
>          add_sequential(task);
>          i->sequential = 0;
>   found:
> -       if (i->sequential + bio->bi_iter.bi_size > i->sequential)
> +       if (bio->bi_iter.bi_size)
>                  i->sequential   += bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
>
>          i->last                  = bio_end_sector(bio);

The above change works, but the code readability decreased because how/why i->sequential is maintained is not that directly visible.

This is a difference of coding styles. IMHO for this particular case, the readability is more important than less CPU instructions.

Thanks.

Coly Li

> Thanks
> Fengfei
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Coly Li [mailto:colyli@suse.de]
> 发送时间: 2021年8月29日 15:50
> 收件人: xifengfei (RD) [ref]
> 抄送: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; 
> kent.overstreet@gmail.com
> 主题: Re: [PATCH] bcache: remove the redundant judgment on bi_size
>
> On 8/29/21 12:49 PM, Fengfei Xi wrote:
>> The bi_size is unsigned int type data not less than 0, so we can 
>> directly add bi_size without extra judgment
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fengfei Xi <redacted>
> NACK. The check is necessary to avoid redundant and unnecessary memory write.
>
> Coly Li
>
>> ---
>>    drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 4 +---
>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c 
>> b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c index 6d1de889b..2788eec3a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
>> @@ -423,9 +423,7 @@ static bool check_should_bypass(struct cached_dev *dc, struct bio *bio)
>>    	add_sequential(task);
>>    	i->sequential = 0;
>>    found:
>> -	if (i->sequential + bio->bi_iter.bi_size > i->sequential)
>> -		i->sequential	+= bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
>> -
>> +	i->sequential		+= bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
>>    	i->last			 = bio_end_sector(bio);
>>    	i->jiffies		 = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(5000);
>>    	task->sequential_io	 = i->sequential;

```