Thread (42 messages) 42 messages, 6 authors, 2026-01-29

Re: [PATCH RFC 03/16] pinctrl: aspeed: g5: Allow use of LPC node instead of LPC host controller

From: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>
Date: 2026-01-09 01:17:39
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-crypto, linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, linux-hwmon, linux-iio, linux-mmc, lkml, openbmc

On Wed, 2025-12-31 at 22:38 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 9:46 AM Andrew Jeffery
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
There's currently a wart where the Aspeed LPC host controller has no
binding specified, but the pinctrl binding depends on referencing its
node.

Allow specification of a phandle to the parent LPC controller instead.
Fall back to testing for a compatible parent node if the provided
phandle doesn't directly resolve to the LPC controller node.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>

I guess when this is non-RFC I will just apply these two patches.
Yeah, no dramas. I intend to split what remains to be applied into
separate (non-RFC) follow-up series now that many of the changes have
been applied.

Andrew
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help