Re: [REGRESSION] rseq: refactoring in v6.19 broke everyone on arm64 and tcmalloc everywhere
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-04-28 08:36:45
Also in:
linux-man, lkml, regressions
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2026-04-28 · Re: [REGRESSION] rseq: refactoring in v6.19 broke everyone on arm64 and tcmalloc everywhere · Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
- 2026-04-27 · Re: [REGRESSION] rseq: refactoring in v6.19 broke everyone on arm64 and tcmalloc everywhere · Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
- 2026-04-27 · Re: [REGRESSION] rseq: refactoring in v6.19 broke everyone on arm64 and tcmalloc everywhere · Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
- 2026-04-27 · Re: [REGRESSION] rseq: refactoring in v6.19 broke everyone on arm64 and tcmalloc everywhere · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- 2026-04-27 · Re: [REGRESSION] rseq: refactoring in v6.19 broke everyone on arm64 and tcmalloc everywhere · Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
On Tue, Apr 28 2026 at 10:03, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 12:04:48AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:quoted
+ * - 5 + - Time slice extensions + - Not supported + - SupportedI'm sure its cute when rendered, but when read as text this is nigh on unreadable.
I tried the other table variants. They are even worse :)