mt76_sta_state() calls the sta_event callback without holding dev->mutex.
However, mt7915_mac_sta_event() (MT7915 implementation of this callback)
calls mt7915_mac_twt_teardown_flow() which has
lockdep_assert_held(&dev->mt76.mutex) indicating that callers must
hold this lock.

The locking pattern in mt76_sta_state() is inconsistent:
- mt76_sta_add() acquires dev->mutex before calling dev->drv->sta_add
- mt76_sta_remove() acquires dev->mutex before calling __mt76_sta_remove
- But sta_event callback is called without acquiring the lock

Add mutex_lock()/mutex_unlock() around the mt7915_mac_twt_teardown_flow
invocation to fix the missing lock protection and maintain consistency
with the existing locking pattern.

Signed-off-by: Ziyi Guo <redacted>
---
v2:
 - Move the locking to MT7915 driver to avoid deadlock in other drivers

 drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/main.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/main.c
index 90d5e79fbf74..e212e964fda0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/main.c

@@ -851,8 +851,10 @@ int mt7915_mac_sta_event(struct mt76_dev *mdev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
 		return mt7915_mcu_add_sta(dev, vif, sta, CONN_STATE_PORT_SECURE, false);
 
 	case MT76_STA_EVENT_DISASSOC:
+		mutex_lock(&dev->mt76.mutex);
 		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(msta->twt.flow); i++)
 			mt7915_mac_twt_teardown_flow(dev, msta, i);
+		mutex_unlock(&dev->mt76.mutex);
 
 		mt7915_mcu_add_sta(dev, vif, sta, CONN_STATE_DISCONNECT, false);
 		msta->wcid.sta_disabled = 1;

-- 
2.34.1