[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 1/5] ARM: 9295/1: unwind:fix unwind abort for uleb128 case
flat view
DORMANTno replies
REVIEWED: 4 (2M)
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-05-20 18:28:12
Also in:
linux-mediatek, lkml, stable
Subsystem:
arm port, the rest · Maintainers:
Russell King, Linus Torvalds
3 review trailers.
From: Haibo Li <redacted>
[ Upstream commit fa3eeb638de0c1a9d2d860e5b48259facdd65176 ]
When unwind instruction is 0xb2,the subsequent instructions
are uleb128 bytes.
For now,it uses only the first uleb128 byte in code.
For vsp increments of 0x204~0x400,use one uleb128 byte like below:
0xc06a00e4 <unwind_test_work>: 0x80b27fac
Compact model index: 0
0xb2 0x7f vsp = vsp + 1024
0xac pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r14}
For vsp increments larger than 0x400,use two uleb128 bytes like below:
0xc06a00e4 <unwind_test_work>: @0xc0cc9e0c
Compact model index: 1
0xb2 0x81 0x01 vsp = vsp + 1032
0xac pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r14}
The unwind works well since the decoded uleb128 byte is also 0x81.
For vsp increments larger than 0x600,use two uleb128 bytes like below:
0xc06a00e4 <unwind_test_work>: @0xc0cc9e0c
Compact model index: 1
0xb2 0x81 0x02 vsp = vsp + 1544
0xac pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, r14}
In this case,the decoded uleb128 result is 0x101(vsp=0x204+(0x101<<2)).
While the uleb128 used in code is 0x81(vsp=0x204+(0x81<<2)).
The unwind aborts at this frame since it gets incorrect vsp.
To fix this,add uleb128 decode to cover all the above case.
Signed-off-by: Haibo Li <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Mergnat <redacted>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c b/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
index 4574e6aea0a52..f321c2aa94e1c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c@@ -300,6 +300,29 @@ static int unwind_exec_pop_subset_r0_to_r3(struct unwind_ctrl_block *ctrl, return URC_OK; } +static unsigned long unwind_decode_uleb128(struct unwind_ctrl_block *ctrl) +{ + unsigned long bytes = 0; + unsigned long insn; + unsigned long result = 0; + + /* + * unwind_get_byte() will advance `ctrl` one instruction at a time, so + * loop until we get an instruction byte where bit 7 is not set. + * + * Note: This decodes a maximum of 4 bytes to output 28 bits data where + * max is 0xfffffff: that will cover a vsp increment of 1073742336, hence + * it is sufficient for unwinding the stack. + */ + do { + insn = unwind_get_byte(ctrl); + result |= (insn & 0x7f) << (bytes * 7); + bytes++; + } while (!!(insn & 0x80) && (bytes != sizeof(result))); + + return result; +} + /* * Execute the current unwind instruction. */
@@ -353,7 +376,7 @@ static int unwind_exec_insn(struct unwind_ctrl_block *ctrl) if (ret) goto error; } else if (insn == 0xb2) { - unsigned long uleb128 = unwind_get_byte(ctrl); + unsigned long uleb128 = unwind_decode_uleb128(ctrl); ctrl->vrs[SP] += 0x204 + (uleb128 << 2); } else {
--
2.39.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel