# Re: \[PATCH 01/11\] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Document assigned-clocks and assigned-clock-rates

- From: Sudeep Holla \<hidden\>
- Date: 2023-03-16 22:28:39 
- List: linux-arm-kernel
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-arm-kernel/2023/03/2137148
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-arm-kernel/2023/03/2134727/t.md

```text
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 03:34:17PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> +Stephen
> 
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 01:47:56PM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> > Since commit df4fdd0db475 ("dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Restrict
> > protocol child node properties") the following dtbs_check warning is
> > shown:
> > 
> >   rk3588-rock-5b.dtb: scmi: protocol@14: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('assigned-clock-rates', 'assigned-clocks' were unexpected)
> 
> I think that's a somewhat questionable use of assigned-clock-rates. It 
> should be located with the consumer rather than the provider IMO. The 
> consumers of those 2 clocks are the CPU nodes.
> 

Agreed. We definitely don't use those in the scmi clk provider driver.
So NACK for the generic SCMI binding change.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
```