[PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: pmu: Document Denver and Carmel PMUs

Subsystems: arm pmu profiling and debugging, open firmware and flattened device tree bindings, the rest

STALE1691d LANDED

Landed in mainline as de3f6daa66cb on 2021-12-08.

12 messages, 4 authors, 2021-12-14 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: pmu: Document Denver and Carmel PMUs

From: Thierry Reding <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-07 15:08:03

From: Thierry Reding <redacted>

Add compatible strings for the NVIDIA Denver and Carmel PMUs.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.yaml | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.yaml
index e17ac049e890..c6447dc86076 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.yaml

@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ properties:
           - arm,neoverse-n1-pmu
           - brcm,vulcan-pmu
           - cavium,thunder-pmu
+          - nvidia,denver-pmu
+          - nvidia,carmel-pmu
           - qcom,krait-pmu
           - qcom,scorpion-pmu
           - qcom,scorpion-mp-pmu

-- 
2.33.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 2/3] arm64: perf: Support Denver and Carmel PMUs

From: Thierry Reding <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-07 15:08:05

From: Thierry Reding <redacted>

Add support for the NVIDIA Denver and Carmel PMUs using the generic
PMUv3 event map for now.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
index b4044469527e..8c8cf369c450 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c

@@ -1247,6 +1247,18 @@ static int armv8_vulcan_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
 				       armv8_vulcan_map_event);
 }
 
+static int armv8_denver_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
+{
+	return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_nvidia_denver",
+				       armv8_pmuv3_map_event);
+}
+
+static int armv8_carmel_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
+{
+	return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_nvidia_carmel",
+				       armv8_pmuv3_map_event);
+}
+
 static const struct of_device_id armv8_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
 	{.compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3",	.data = armv8_pmuv3_init},
 	{.compatible = "arm,cortex-a34-pmu",	.data = armv8_a34_pmu_init},

@@ -1265,6 +1277,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id armv8_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
 	{.compatible = "arm,neoverse-n1-pmu",	.data = armv8_n1_pmu_init},
 	{.compatible = "cavium,thunder-pmu",	.data = armv8_thunder_pmu_init},
 	{.compatible = "brcm,vulcan-pmu",	.data = armv8_vulcan_pmu_init},
+	{.compatible = "nvidia,denver-pmu",	.data = armv8_denver_pmu_init},
+	{.compatible = "nvidia,carmel-pmu",	.data = armv8_carmel_pmu_init},
 	{},
 };

-- 
2.33.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: perf: Support Denver and Carmel PMUs

From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Date: 2021-12-07 16:03:35

On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 04:07:45PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:

quoted hunk

From: Thierry Reding <redacted>

Add support for the NVIDIA Denver and Carmel PMUs using the generic
PMUv3 event map for now.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
index b4044469527e..8c8cf369c450 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c

@@ -1247,6 +1247,18 @@ static int armv8_vulcan_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
 				       armv8_vulcan_map_event);
 }
 
+static int armv8_denver_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
+{
+	return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_nvidia_denver",
+				       armv8_pmuv3_map_event);
+}
+
+static int armv8_carmel_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
+{
+	return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_nvidia_carmel",
+				       armv8_pmuv3_map_event);
+}
+
 static const struct of_device_id armv8_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
 	{.compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3",	.data = armv8_pmuv3_init},
 	{.compatible = "arm,cortex-a34-pmu",	.data = armv8_a34_pmu_init},

@@ -1265,6 +1277,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id armv8_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
 	{.compatible = "arm,neoverse-n1-pmu",	.data = armv8_n1_pmu_init},
 	{.compatible = "cavium,thunder-pmu",	.data = armv8_thunder_pmu_init},
 	{.compatible = "brcm,vulcan-pmu",	.data = armv8_vulcan_pmu_init},
+	{.compatible = "nvidia,denver-pmu",	.data = armv8_denver_pmu_init},
+	{.compatible = "nvidia,carmel-pmu",	.data = armv8_carmel_pmu_init},

Super trivial nit, but could we please organise this alphabetically (i.e. with carmel first?)

With that:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

I see now that we messed up the order of "cavium,thunder-pmu" and
"brcm,vulcan-pmu", but otherwise this is ordered, and it's be nice to keep it
that way. I can fix the order of those two in a separate patch.

Thanks,
Mark.

 	{},
 };
 
-- 
2.33.1

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: perf: Support Denver and Carmel PMUs

From: Thierry Reding <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-08 14:36:09

On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 04:03:25PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:

On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 04:07:45PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:

quoted

From: Thierry Reding <redacted>

Add support for the NVIDIA Denver and Carmel PMUs using the generic
PMUv3 event map for now.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
index b4044469527e..8c8cf369c450 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c

@@ -1247,6 +1247,18 @@ static int armv8_vulcan_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
 				       armv8_vulcan_map_event);
 }
 
+static int armv8_denver_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
+{
+	return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_nvidia_denver",
+				       armv8_pmuv3_map_event);
+}
+
+static int armv8_carmel_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
+{
+	return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_nvidia_carmel",
+				       armv8_pmuv3_map_event);
+}
+
 static const struct of_device_id armv8_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
 	{.compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3",	.data = armv8_pmuv3_init},
 	{.compatible = "arm,cortex-a34-pmu",	.data = armv8_a34_pmu_init},

@@ -1265,6 +1277,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id armv8_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
 	{.compatible = "arm,neoverse-n1-pmu",	.data = armv8_n1_pmu_init},
 	{.compatible = "cavium,thunder-pmu",	.data = armv8_thunder_pmu_init},
 	{.compatible = "brcm,vulcan-pmu",	.data = armv8_vulcan_pmu_init},
+	{.compatible = "nvidia,denver-pmu",	.data = armv8_denver_pmu_init},
+	{.compatible = "nvidia,carmel-pmu",	.data = armv8_carmel_pmu_init},

Super trivial nit, but could we please organise this alphabetically (i.e. with carmel first?)

With that:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

I see now that we messed up the order of "cavium,thunder-pmu" and
"brcm,vulcan-pmu", but otherwise this is ordered, and it's be nice to keep it
that way. I can fix the order of those two in a separate patch.

I ordered this chronologically (Denver for Tegra186 and Carmel for
Tegra194), which seemed a bit more natural, but I can reorder this
alphabetically if you prefer.

Would Will be the right person to pick this up or should I take it
through the Tegra tree and then ARM SoC?

Thanks,
Thierry

Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: perf: Support Denver and Carmel PMUs

From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-12-14 12:34:05

On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 03:36:02PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:

On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 04:03:25PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 04:07:45PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:

quoted

From: Thierry Reding <redacted>

Add support for the NVIDIA Denver and Carmel PMUs using the generic
PMUv3 event map for now.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
index b4044469527e..8c8cf369c450 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c

@@ -1247,6 +1247,18 @@ static int armv8_vulcan_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
 				       armv8_vulcan_map_event);
 }
 
+static int armv8_denver_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
+{
+	return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_nvidia_denver",
+				       armv8_pmuv3_map_event);
+}
+
+static int armv8_carmel_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
+{
+	return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_nvidia_carmel",
+				       armv8_pmuv3_map_event);
+}
+
 static const struct of_device_id armv8_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
 	{.compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3",	.data = armv8_pmuv3_init},
 	{.compatible = "arm,cortex-a34-pmu",	.data = armv8_a34_pmu_init},

@@ -1265,6 +1277,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id armv8_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
 	{.compatible = "arm,neoverse-n1-pmu",	.data = armv8_n1_pmu_init},
 	{.compatible = "cavium,thunder-pmu",	.data = armv8_thunder_pmu_init},
 	{.compatible = "brcm,vulcan-pmu",	.data = armv8_vulcan_pmu_init},
+	{.compatible = "nvidia,denver-pmu",	.data = armv8_denver_pmu_init},
+	{.compatible = "nvidia,carmel-pmu",	.data = armv8_carmel_pmu_init},

Super trivial nit, but could we please organise this alphabetically (i.e. with carmel first?)

With that:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

I see now that we messed up the order of "cavium,thunder-pmu" and
"brcm,vulcan-pmu", but otherwise this is ordered, and it's be nice to keep it
that way. I can fix the order of those two in a separate patch.

I ordered this chronologically (Denver for Tegra186 and Carmel for
Tegra194), which seemed a bit more natural, but I can reorder this
alphabetically if you prefer.

Would Will be the right person to pick this up or should I take it
through the Tegra tree and then ARM SoC?

Sorry, I missed this somehow. I've got some perf patches pending already, so
it would be easiest for me to take this one directly (and then I can apply
Robin's stuff on top). Is that ok?

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: perf: Support Denver and Carmel PMUs

From: Thierry Reding <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-14 14:28:55

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 12:33:53PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:

On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 03:36:02PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 04:03:25PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 04:07:45PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:

quoted

From: Thierry Reding <redacted>

Add support for the NVIDIA Denver and Carmel PMUs using the generic
PMUv3 event map for now.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
index b4044469527e..8c8cf369c450 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c

@@ -1247,6 +1247,18 @@ static int armv8_vulcan_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
 				       armv8_vulcan_map_event);
 }
 
+static int armv8_denver_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
+{
+	return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_nvidia_denver",
+				       armv8_pmuv3_map_event);
+}
+
+static int armv8_carmel_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
+{
+	return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_nvidia_carmel",
+				       armv8_pmuv3_map_event);
+}
+
 static const struct of_device_id armv8_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
 	{.compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3",	.data = armv8_pmuv3_init},
 	{.compatible = "arm,cortex-a34-pmu",	.data = armv8_a34_pmu_init},

@@ -1265,6 +1277,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id armv8_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
 	{.compatible = "arm,neoverse-n1-pmu",	.data = armv8_n1_pmu_init},
 	{.compatible = "cavium,thunder-pmu",	.data = armv8_thunder_pmu_init},
 	{.compatible = "brcm,vulcan-pmu",	.data = armv8_vulcan_pmu_init},
+	{.compatible = "nvidia,denver-pmu",	.data = armv8_denver_pmu_init},
+	{.compatible = "nvidia,carmel-pmu",	.data = armv8_carmel_pmu_init},

Super trivial nit, but could we please organise this alphabetically (i.e. with carmel first?)

With that:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

I see now that we messed up the order of "cavium,thunder-pmu" and
"brcm,vulcan-pmu", but otherwise this is ordered, and it's be nice to keep it
that way. I can fix the order of those two in a separate patch.

I ordered this chronologically (Denver for Tegra186 and Carmel for
Tegra194), which seemed a bit more natural, but I can reorder this
alphabetically if you prefer.

Would Will be the right person to pick this up or should I take it
through the Tegra tree and then ARM SoC?

Sorry, I missed this somehow. I've got some perf patches pending already, so
it would be easiest for me to take this one directly (and then I can apply
Robin's stuff on top). Is that ok?

Sure, works for me. Do you still want me to address Mark's comment
regarding the sorting order (chronological vs. alphabetical)? It wasn't
clear to me if Mark still wanted that after my explanation.

Thierry

Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: perf: Support Denver and Carmel PMUs

From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-12-14 14:36:23

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 03:28:40PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 12:33:53PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 03:36:02PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 04:03:25PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 04:07:45PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:

quoted

From: Thierry Reding <redacted>

Add support for the NVIDIA Denver and Carmel PMUs using the generic
PMUv3 event map for now.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
index b4044469527e..8c8cf369c450 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c

@@ -1247,6 +1247,18 @@ static int armv8_vulcan_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
 				       armv8_vulcan_map_event);
 }
 
+static int armv8_denver_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
+{
+	return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_nvidia_denver",
+				       armv8_pmuv3_map_event);
+}
+
+static int armv8_carmel_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
+{
+	return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_nvidia_carmel",
+				       armv8_pmuv3_map_event);
+}
+
 static const struct of_device_id armv8_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
 	{.compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3",	.data = armv8_pmuv3_init},
 	{.compatible = "arm,cortex-a34-pmu",	.data = armv8_a34_pmu_init},

@@ -1265,6 +1277,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id armv8_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
 	{.compatible = "arm,neoverse-n1-pmu",	.data = armv8_n1_pmu_init},
 	{.compatible = "cavium,thunder-pmu",	.data = armv8_thunder_pmu_init},
 	{.compatible = "brcm,vulcan-pmu",	.data = armv8_vulcan_pmu_init},
+	{.compatible = "nvidia,denver-pmu",	.data = armv8_denver_pmu_init},
+	{.compatible = "nvidia,carmel-pmu",	.data = armv8_carmel_pmu_init},

Super trivial nit, but could we please organise this alphabetically (i.e. with carmel first?)

With that:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

I see now that we messed up the order of "cavium,thunder-pmu" and
"brcm,vulcan-pmu", but otherwise this is ordered, and it's be nice to keep it
that way. I can fix the order of those two in a separate patch.

I ordered this chronologically (Denver for Tegra186 and Carmel for
Tegra194), which seemed a bit more natural, but I can reorder this
alphabetically if you prefer.

Would Will be the right person to pick this up or should I take it
through the Tegra tree and then ARM SoC?

Sorry, I missed this somehow. I've got some perf patches pending already, so
it would be easiest for me to take this one directly (and then I can apply
Robin's stuff on top). Is that ok?

Sure, works for me. Do you still want me to address Mark's comment
regarding the sorting order (chronological vs. alphabetical)? It wasn't
clear to me if Mark still wanted that after my explanation.

No need -- Robin's picked this into his series:

https://lore.kernel.org/r/5f0f69d47acca78a9e479501aa4d8b429e23cf11.1639490264.git.robin.murphy@arm.com

so now I just need to pick that lot up.

Thanks!

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 3/3] arm64: tegra: Drop arm,armv8-pmuv3 compatible string

From: Thierry Reding <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-07 15:08:07

From: Thierry Reding <redacted>

The arm,armv8-pmuv3 compatible string is meant to be used only for
software models and not silicon chips. Drop them and use silicon-
specific compatible strings instead.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi | 4 ++--
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi
index 5f8132884be0..eb739ffbdfce 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi

@@ -1892,14 +1892,14 @@ L2_A57: l2-cache1 {
 	};
 
 	pmu_denver {
-		compatible = "nvidia,denver-pmu", "arm,armv8-pmuv3";
+		compatible = "nvidia,denver-pmu";
 		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 320 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
 			     <GIC_SPI 321 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
 		interrupt-affinity = <&denver_0 &denver_1>;
 	};
 
 	pmu_a57 {
-		compatible = "arm,cortex-a57-pmu", "arm,armv8-pmuv3";
+		compatible = "arm,cortex-a57-pmu";
 		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 296 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
 			     <GIC_SPI 297 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
 			     <GIC_SPI 298 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi
index 8d29b7fdb044..a0025b1c425f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi

@@ -2687,7 +2687,7 @@ l3c: l3-cache {
 	};
 
 	pmu {
-		compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3";
+		compatible = "nvidia,carmel-pmu";
 		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 384 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
 			     <GIC_SPI 385 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
 			     <GIC_SPI 386 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,

-- 
2.33.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: pmu: Document Denver and Carmel PMUs

From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-12-08 13:44:48

On Tue, 07 Dec 2021 16:07:44 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:

From: Thierry Reding <redacted>

Add compatible strings for the NVIDIA Denver and Carmel PMUs.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.yaml | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
incorrect. These may not be new warnings.

Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
This will change in the future.

Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1564747


arm-pmu: compatible: Additional items are not allowed ('arm,armv8-pmuv3' was unexpected)
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-400.dt.yaml
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-4-b.dt.yaml
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-io.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-400.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-4-b.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-io.dt.yaml

arm-pmu: compatible: ['arm,cortex-a72-pmu', 'arm,armv8-pmuv3'] is too long
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-400.dt.yaml
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-4-b.dt.yaml
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-io.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-400.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-4-b.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-io.dt.yaml

pmu@40089000: 'reg' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
	arch/arm/boot/dts/vf500-colibri-eval-v3.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-bk4.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-colibri-eval-v3.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-cosmic.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-twr.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-zii-cfu1.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-zii-dev-rev-b.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-zii-dev-rev-c.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-zii-scu4-aib.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-zii-spb4.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-zii-ssmb-dtu.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-zii-ssmb-spu3.dt.yaml

pmu@54000000: 'reg', 'ti,hwmods' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
	arch/arm/boot/dts/am3517-craneboard.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/am3517-evm.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/am3517_mt_ventoux.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/logicpd-som-lv-37xx-devkit.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/logicpd-torpedo-37xx-devkit.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3430-sdp.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-beagle.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-beagle-xm-ab.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-beagle-xm.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-cm-t3517.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-cm-t3530.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-cm-t3730.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-devkit8000.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-devkit8000-lcd43.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-devkit8000-lcd70.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-echo.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-evm-37xx.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-evm.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04a3.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04a4.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04a5.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04a5one.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-ha.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-ha-lcd.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep0020.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep0020-rev-f.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep0030.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-igep0030-rev-g.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-ldp.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-lilly-dbb056.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n950.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n9.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-alto35.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-chestnut43.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-gallop43.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-palo35.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-palo43.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-storm-alto35.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-storm-chestnut43.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-storm-gallop43.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-storm-palo35.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-storm-palo43.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-storm-summit.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-storm-tobi.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-storm-tobiduo.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-summit.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-tobi.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-overo-tobiduo.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-pandora-1ghz.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-pandora-600mhz.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-sbc-t3517.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-sbc-t3530.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-sbc-t3730.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-sniper.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-thunder.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-zoom3.dt.yaml

pmu_a57: compatible: Additional items are not allowed ('arm,armv8-pmuv3' was unexpected)
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186-p2771-0000.dt.yaml
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001.dt.yaml

pmu_a57: compatible: ['arm,cortex-a57-pmu', 'arm,armv8-pmuv3'] is too long
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186-p2771-0000.dt.yaml
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001.dt.yaml

pmu: compatible: Additional items are not allowed ('arm,armv8-pmuv3' was unexpected)
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/apm/apm-mustang.dt.yaml
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/cavium/thunder2-99xx.dt.yaml
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/cavium/thunder-88xx.dt.yaml
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/sp9860g-1h10.dt.yaml
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/synaptics/berlin4ct-dmp.dt.yaml
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/synaptics/berlin4ct-stb.dt.yaml

pmu: compatible: ['apm,potenza-pmu', 'arm,armv8-pmuv3'] is too long
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/apm/apm-mustang.dt.yaml

pmu: compatible: ['arm,cortex-a53-pmu', 'arm,armv8-pmuv3'] is too long
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/sp9860g-1h10.dt.yaml
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/synaptics/berlin4ct-dmp.dt.yaml
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/synaptics/berlin4ct-stb.dt.yaml

pmu: compatible: ['brcm,vulcan-pmu', 'arm,armv8-pmuv3'] is too long
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/cavium/thunder2-99xx.dt.yaml

pmu: compatible: ['cavium,thunder-pmu', 'arm,armv8-pmuv3'] is too long
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/cavium/thunder-88xx.dt.yaml

pmu_denver: compatible: Additional items are not allowed ('arm,armv8-pmuv3' was unexpected)
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186-p2771-0000.dt.yaml
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001.dt.yaml

pmu_denver: compatible: ['nvidia,denver-pmu', 'arm,armv8-pmuv3'] is too long
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186-p2771-0000.dt.yaml
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001.dt.yaml

pmu@f8891000: 'reg' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
	arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-cc108.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-ebaz4205.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-microzed.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-parallella.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc702.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc706.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc770-xm010.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc770-xm011.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc770-xm012.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc770-xm013.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zed.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zturn.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zturn-v5.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zybo.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zybo-z7.dt.yaml

pmu@ff111000: 'reg' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
	arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_arria10_mercury_aa1.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_arria10_socdk_nand.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_arria10_socdk_qspi.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_arria10_socdk_sdmmc.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_arria5_socdk.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_chameleon96.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_nano_soc.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_mcvevk.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_socdk.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_sockit.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_socrates.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_sodia.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_vining_fpga.dt.yaml
	arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_vt.dt.yaml


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: pmu: Document Denver and Carmel PMUs

From: Thierry Reding <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-08 14:41:16

On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 07:44:28AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:

On Tue, 07 Dec 2021 16:07:44 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:

quoted

From: Thierry Reding <redacted>

Add compatible strings for the NVIDIA Denver and Carmel PMUs.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.yaml | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
incorrect. These may not be new warnings.

Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
This will change in the future.

Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1564747

Yikes, that's a lot of warnings. I've got local patches to fix up the
Tegra-specific ones, but I could look at fixing up the others as well,
provided that you or anyone else aren't looking at this yet.

On that note: do you know of a simple trick to get the dtbs_check target
to run on all DTB files? The only way I've found so far is to manually
select all Kconfig options that would enable a specific subset, but it'd
be great if we could just run the checks on all irrespective of .config.

Thierry

Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: pmu: Document Denver and Carmel PMUs

From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-12-08 17:06:27

On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 8:41 AM Thierry Reding [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 07:44:28AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:

quoted

On Tue, 07 Dec 2021 16:07:44 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:

quoted

From: Thierry Reding <redacted>

Add compatible strings for the NVIDIA Denver and Carmel PMUs.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.yaml | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
incorrect. These may not be new warnings.

Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
This will change in the future.

Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1564747

Yikes, that's a lot of warnings. I've got local patches to fix up the
Tegra-specific ones, but I could look at fixing up the others as well,
provided that you or anyone else aren't looking at this yet.

I sent it because I saw the tegra ones.

On that note: do you know of a simple trick to get the dtbs_check target
to run on all DTB files? The only way I've found so far is to manually
select all Kconfig options that would enable a specific subset, but it'd
be great if we could just run the checks on all irrespective of .config.

Yes, there's a config option hidden behind COMPILE_TEST. I just use
allmodconfig/allyesconfig when I want to do that.

Rob

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: pmu: Document Denver and Carmel PMUs

From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-12-08 18:51:33

On Tue, 07 Dec 2021 16:07:44 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:

From: Thierry Reding <redacted>

Add compatible strings for the NVIDIA Denver and Carmel PMUs.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.yaml | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Given the other compatible string additions I picked up, I applied this 
one too.

Rob

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help