# Re: \[PATCH 3/3\] pinctrl: meson: add pinctrl driver support for Meson-S4 Soc

- From: Jerome Brunet \<jbrunet@baylibre.com\>
- Date: 2021-12-16 09:22:20 
- List: linux-arm-kernel
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-arm-kernel/2021/12/1610645
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-arm-kernel/2021/12/1607554/t.md

```text

On Thu 16 Dec 2021 at 14:07, qianggui.song [ref] wrote:

>>> +static const unsigned int clk12_24_pins[]		= { GPIOD_10 };
>>> +static const unsigned int pwm_g_hiz_pins[]		= { GPIOD_11 };
>>> +
>> [...]
>> 
>>> +
>>> +static const char * const tdm_groups[] = {
>>> +	"tdm_d2_c", "tdm_d3_c", "tdm_fs1_c", "tdm_d4_c", "tdm_d5_c",
>>> +	"tdm_fs1_d", "tdm_d4_d", "tdm_d3_d", "tdm_d2_d", "tdm_sclk1_d",
>>> +	"tdm_sclk1_h", "tdm_fs1_h", "tdm_d2_h", "tdm_d3_h", "tdm_d4_h",
>>> +	"tdm_d1", "tdm_d0", "tdm_fs0", "tdm_sclk0", "tdm_fs2", "tdm_sclk2",
>>> +	"tdm_d4_z", "tdm_d5_z", "tdm_d6", "tdm_d7"
>>> +};
>> On previous chip, there were pin assigned to tdm A, B or C.
>> On this generation, it seems you have added a second level on pinmuxing
>> to re-route the audio pins to different controllers
>> In such case, I don't think they belong in the same group.
>> Depending on settins, D2 and D3 could be unrelated
>> I think each audio pin should have its own group (one group for D3, one
>> D4, etc ...)
>> 
> According to our audio colleague, on this chip, tdm A/B/C can choose which
> pins are routed to their controllers freely by writing special registers,
> say, tdm_d2_c can be assigned to any of tdm a, b and c by demand, so no
> need to specify a/b/c words any more.

That's basically my comment above. Comment still stands
Each D and FS pin could be related to different interface and should be
in different groups


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
```