On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 4:46 AM Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2021 16:40:17 +0200, Johan Jonker wrote:
quoted
Convert rockchip,pinctrl.txt to YAML
Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <redacted>
---
Changed V3:
(...)
Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
incorrect. These may not be new warnings.
Rob can you tell me how you like me to handle this?
Do we merge the nice new bindings and deal with the
aftermath or do we need to fix the DTS files in the same
patch series?
Thanks,
Linus Walleij
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Hi Linus,
Am Donnerstag, 14. Oktober 2021, 00:31:59 CEST schrieb Linus Walleij:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 4:46 AM Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 07 Oct 2021 16:40:17 +0200, Johan Jonker wrote:
quoted
Convert rockchip,pinctrl.txt to YAML
Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <redacted>
---
Changed V3:
(...)
quoted
Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
incorrect. These may not be new warnings.
Rob can you tell me how you like me to handle this?
Do we merge the nice new bindings and deal with the
aftermath or do we need to fix the DTS files in the same
patch series?
I guess personally I'd say it comes together in linux-next.
But if you like your pinctrl-tree without additional warnings dtbs_check
till the next -rc1, I'll add Acks to patches 1+2.
Heiko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 5:32 PM Linus Walleij [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 4:46 AM Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 07 Oct 2021 16:40:17 +0200, Johan Jonker wrote:
quoted
Convert rockchip,pinctrl.txt to YAML
Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <redacted>
---
Changed V3:
(...)
quoted
Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
incorrect. These may not be new warnings.
Rob can you tell me how you like me to handle this?
Do we merge the nice new bindings and deal with the
aftermath or do we need to fix the DTS files in the same
patch series?
Did the next paragraph not answer that? Added back:
quoted
Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
This will change in the future.
So no requirement to fix the dtb warnings immediately nor create any
merge dependency.
Rob
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel