This mp1 pinmuxing is a total mess, sigh.
Can you please also fix sai1a-4 and sai1a-5, which should really be sai1a-2 and sai1a-sleep-2 ? Same as the sai2b-4 and sai2b-5 should be sai2b-2 and sai2b-sleep-2 .
With that, it would be perfect, thank you.
[...]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Can you please also fix sai1a-4 and sai1a-5, which should really be sai1a-2 and sai1a-sleep-2 ? Same as the sai2b-4 and sai2b-5 should be sai2b-2 and sai2b-sleep-2 .
With that, it would be perfect, thank you.
[...]
The same-old discussion about where to place the pinmux nodes, whether we should have these clusters of pre-defined options in ...pinctrl.dtsi, or whether we should do more nxp-like per-board configuration.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
The same-old discussion about where to place the pinmux nodes, whether we should have these clusters of pre-defined options in ...pinctrl.dtsi, or whether we should do more nxp-like per-board configuration.
ok it's a bit more precise. Honestly I don't understand why the current topology is an issue here. Maybe pinctrl SAI nodes names are not well chosen or are not enough explicit. Concerning our topology and the NXP ones both exists and both have advantages and drawbacks. For ST boards (DK/EV) we want to keep all configs in the same place.
As I prefer to not re open this topic again and again, feel free to add your pin config in your dts board file, I'll accept it.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
The same-old discussion about where to place the pinmux nodes, whether we should have these clusters of pre-defined options in ...pinctrl.dtsi, or whether we should do more nxp-like per-board configuration.
ok it's a bit more precise. Honestly I don't understand why the current topology is an issue here. Maybe pinctrl SAI nodes names are not well chosen or are not enough explicit. Concerning our topology and the NXP ones both exists and both have advantages and drawbacks. For ST boards (DK/EV) we want to keep all configs in the same place.
As I prefer to not re open this topic again and again, feel free to add your pin config in your dts board file, I'll accept it.
Yes, let's not reopen it. I'm sorry if my grumbling came across as too strong.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel