Pointers should be printed with %p or %px rather than
cast to (unsigned long) and printed with %lx.
Change %lx to %pK to print the pointers.
Signed-off-by: Guo Zhi <redacted>
---
.../staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:55:54AM +0800, Guo Zhi wrote:
quoted hunk
Pointers should be printed with %p or %px rather than
cast to (unsigned long) and printed with %lx.
Change %lx to %pK to print the pointers.
Signed-off-by: Guo Zhi <redacted>
---
.../staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Why print this out at all? What uses this? Can it just be deleted?
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
From: Stefan Wahren <hidden> Date: 2021-09-23 10:21:04
Add Phil
Am 23.09.21 um 07:19 schrieb Greg KH:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:55:54AM +0800, Guo Zhi wrote:
quoted
Pointers should be printed with %p or %px rather than
cast to (unsigned long) and printed with %lx.
Change %lx to %pK to print the pointers.
Signed-off-by: Guo Zhi <redacted>
---
.../staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Why print this out at all? What uses this? Can it just be deleted?
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
We should restrict kernel pointer leakage issue by using kptr_restrict.
Therefore kernel pointers should be specified by %pK rather than %lx.
Thanks.
Guo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg KH" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Guo Zhi" <redacted>
Cc: nsaenz@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, maz@kernel.org, bsegall@google.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, airlied@redhat.com, "kan liang" <redacted>, odin@uged.al, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, "linux-kernel" <redacted>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 1:19:34 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vchip_arm: Fix misuse of %x
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:55:54AM +0800, Guo Zhi wrote:
quoted hunk
Pointers should be printed with %p or %px rather than
cast to (unsigned long) and printed with %lx.
Change %lx to %pK to print the pointers.
Signed-off-by: Guo Zhi <redacted>
---
.../staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Why print this out at all? What uses this? Can it just be deleted?
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post
Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 08:57:40PM +0800, Guo Zhi wrote:
We should restrict kernel pointer leakage issue by using kptr_restrict.
Therefore kernel pointers should be specified by %pK rather than %lx.
I totally agree.
What I am asking about is why is this message needed at all? Why not
just remove the whole thing? Who uses it?
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:55:54AM +0800, Guo Zhi wrote:
quoted
Pointers should be printed with %p or %px rather than
cast to (unsigned long) and printed with %lx.
Change %lx to %pK to print the pointers.
Signed-off-by: Guo Zhi <redacted>
---
.../staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Why print this out at all? What uses this? Can it just be deleted?
thanks,
greg k-h
This information is printed for debugging usage.
But malicious user process can also print it through debugfs at /sys/kernel/debug.
As it can be used for debugging, it's a little radical to just delete.
Therefore, I suggest replacing %lx with %pK to avoid kernel address leakage.
thanks,
Guo
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:55:54AM +0800, Guo Zhi wrote:
Pointers should be printed with %p or %px rather than
cast to (unsigned long) and printed with %lx.
Change %lx to %pK to print the pointers.
Signed-off-by: Guo Zhi <redacted>
---
.../staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Does not apply to my tree :(
Please rebase and resend.
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel