The Mediatek MT8195 sound hardware is only present on Mediatek MT8195
SoCs. Hence add a dependency on ARCH_MEDIATEK, to prevent asking the
user about this driver when configuring a kernel without Mediatek SoC
support.
Fixes: 6746cc858259985a ("ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: add platform driver")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
---
sound/soc/mediatek/Kconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
On Tue, 2021-08-31 at 15:18 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
quoted hunk
The Mediatek MT8195 sound hardware is only present on Mediatek MT8195
SoCs. Hence add a dependency on ARCH_MEDIATEK, to prevent asking the
user about this driver when configuring a kernel without Mediatek SoC
support.
Fixes: 6746cc858259985a ("ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: add platform
driver")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
---
sound/soc/mediatek/Kconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ config SND_SOC_MT8192_MT6359_RT1015_RT5682configSND_SOC_MT8195tristate"ASoC support for Mediatek MT8195 chip"+depends onARCH_MEDIATEK||COMPILE_TESTselectSND_SOC_MEDIATEKhelpThisaddsASoCplatformdriversupportforMediatekMT8195
chip
Hi Geert,
Thanks for your patch first.
I really missed the dependency declaration.
But we only test "depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK" internally, maybe removing
"COMPILE_TEST" like other MTK series is better for the maintenance in
the future.
Thanks,
Trevor
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Hi Trevor,
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 5:48 AM Trevor Wu [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 2021-08-31 at 15:18 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
quoted
The Mediatek MT8195 sound hardware is only present on Mediatek MT8195
SoCs. Hence add a dependency on ARCH_MEDIATEK, to prevent asking the
user about this driver when configuring a kernel without Mediatek SoC
support.
Fixes: 6746cc858259985a ("ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: add platform
driver")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
---
sound/soc/mediatek/Kconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ config SND_SOC_MT8192_MT6359_RT1015_RT5682configSND_SOC_MT8195tristate"ASoC support for Mediatek MT8195 chip"+depends onARCH_MEDIATEK||COMPILE_TESTselectSND_SOC_MEDIATEKhelpThisaddsASoCplatformdriversupportforMediatekMT8195
chip
Hi Geert,
Thanks for your patch first.
I really missed the dependency declaration.
But we only test "depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK" internally, maybe removing
"COMPILE_TEST" like other MTK series is better for the maintenance in
the future.
If the driver compiles with CONFIG_ARCH_MEDIATEK=n, it is better
to enable compile-testing, as that may catch issues.\
I didn't change the existing MTK symbols, only new symbols.
(adding missing dependencies to existing symbols is in my (huge) backlog ;-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Date: 2021-09-01 18:15:28
On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 15:18:54 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
The Mediatek MT8195 sound hardware is only present on Mediatek MT8195
SoCs. Hence add a dependency on ARCH_MEDIATEK, to prevent asking the
user about this driver when configuring a kernel without Mediatek SoC
support.
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: mediatek: SND_SOC_MT8195 should depend on ARCH_MEDIATEK
commit: 940ffa19454704ca2ecd23b0d8dd604c93421bfa
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel