# Re: \[PATCH 1/2\] arm64: dts: allwinner: h5: align operating-points table name with dtschema

- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski \<hidden\>
- Date: 2021-08-20 12:49:08 
- List: linux-arm-kernel
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-arm-kernel/2021/08/1483936
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-devicetree/2021/08/1483670/t.md

```text
On 20/08/2021 14:11, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 4:16 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> [ref] wrote:
>>
>> Align the name of operating-points node to dtschema to fix warnings like:
>>
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5-nanopi-r1s-h5.dt.yaml:
>>     cpu-opp-table: $nodename:0: 'cpu-opp-table' does not match '^opp-table(-[a-z0-9]+)?$'
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <redacted>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5-cpu-opp.dtsi | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5-cpu-opp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5-cpu-opp.dtsi
>> index b2657201957e..0b6914a165b0 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5-cpu-opp.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5-cpu-opp.dtsi
>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>>  // Copyright (C) 2020 Chen-Yu Tsai [ref]
>>
>>  / {
>> -       cpu_opp_table: cpu-opp-table {
>> +       cpu_opp_table: opp-table-0 {
> 
> Maybe we should just reorder the name? Name it "opp-table-cpu" instead.
> That way if and when we add one for the GPU, we don't accidentally
> clash on the name.

Although the schema allows such name, but still the devicetree
specification says that name should be generic (representing generic
type of a device). Just like there is a "clock-controller" or
"nand-controller", there should be generic "opp-table".


Best regards,
Krzysztof

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
```